digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]

digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/)
-   Avisynth Scripting (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/avisynth/)
-   -   Avisynth: Blockbuster Vs DCTfilter? (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/avisynth/13880-avisynth-blockbuster-vs.html)

supermule 10-13-2005 02:52 AM

Avisynth: Blockbuster Vs DCTfilter?
 
What is a proven way to remove all those DCT effects with underwater/Dark/Night scenes.

Blockbuster ?????? yeah

DCTfilter ??????? yes

I use the following settings for them :

DCTFilter(1,1,1,1,1,1,0.5,0)

Vs

Blockbuster(method="noise",detail_min=1,detail_max =10,variance=0.3,seed=5623)

Dialhot 10-13-2005 04:11 AM

Re: Blockbuster Vs DCTfilter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by supermule
Blockbuster ?????? yeah

Yes.

Quote:

DCTfilter ??????? yes
Not at all. Despites its name, this filter has nothing to do with DCT blocks.

The other best way is to stop using your crappy downloaded Divx sources !
(use MKV with RV9/10 insteed :wink:)

supermule 10-13-2005 04:40 AM

Re: Blockbuster Vs DCTfilter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dialhot
Quote:

Originally Posted by supermule
Blockbuster ?????? yeah


Yes.

okay thanks, Are these the recommended settings, if used just before the addborder line.

Quote:

DCTfilter ??????? yes

Not at all. Despites its name, this filter has nothing to do with DCT blocks.
hmmm, can you educate me on this one, what does it do then ????

Quote:

The other best way is to stop using your crappy downloaded Divx sources !
(use MKV with RV9/10 insteed :wink:)
Can the doctor say"I cant cure this !!!", the challange is to find a solution for all kinds of sources....good or crappy :wink: , sometimes you fail, sometimes you dont :D

Anyways whats "MKV with RV9/10" ???

Dialhot 10-13-2005 04:57 AM

Re: Blockbuster Vs DCTfilter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by supermule
hmmm, can you educate me on this one, what does it do then ????

Read this thread to see how we try to use DCTFilter to solve a problem (before to go for other solution). You will see what DCTFilter is for.
http://www.kvcd.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=117789

Quote:

Anyways whats "MKV with RV9/10" ???
Real Video codec (version 9 or 10) is a video codec that do not suffer about DCT blocks like Divx/Xvids. But let's forget, it's off toppic.

supermule 10-13-2005 05:13 AM

Re: Blockbuster Vs DCTfilter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by supermule
Blockbuster(method="noise",detail_min=1,detail_max =10,variance=0.3,seed=5623)

thanks for the link, but is this the recommended setting for blockbuster ??

Dialhot 10-13-2005 05:22 AM

To avoid creation of DCT block into the converted video, yes it is (just before the addborders line, like you said).

incredible 10-13-2005 06:41 AM

Re: Blockbuster Vs DCTfilter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by supermule
Quote:

The other best way is to stop using your crappy downloaded Divx sources !
(use MKV with RV9/10 insteed :wink:)
Can the doctor say"I cant cure this !!!", the challange is to find a solution for all kinds of sources....good or crappy :wink: , sometimes you fail, sometimes you dont :D

But the doctor is intelligent enough to recognise what are the "hidden" subjetcs between the lines the patient is talking about.

The challenge in here is NOT "trying to fix thrashy overcompressed sources where std. workout procedures have been used before they have been shared". For that there are enough xvid/divx sharing communities on earth.

If you got a too blocky result (in this case your source) then do a backup again from the original using better settings.

Supermule this is a clear warning cause in here in the past there occured a big diskussion about this and the final decision from the forums owner was to kick out those subjects.

The lines above are very unemeotional and souveraign typed as you could imagin a member "Supermule", living in "Donkeyland" which is permanently asking for enhancing bad source qualities "could" push this forum into a "suspect" view for Official/Government Departments if at least a Moderator didn't spoke out a clear warning like this.

To me its clear paradox: On the one side changing the forums state in a way so no more activity like in the past is given, but on the other hand, continuing via the back door.

Please dont point me on "No XVID/DIVX Therms have been directly named" .... its clearly recognisable.

supermule 10-13-2005 07:09 AM

I clearly work with all kind of sources but in terms with the rules of the forum, I dont discuss the "ones not to be" in this forum.

I discuss only the methodologies and technicalities to clear my doubts.(thats not violating the terms of the forum).

I respect the rules of this forum without Question!!!.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 AM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd

Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.