Old KVCD Matrix verses new Notch Matrix
Kwag,
I don't know if i've made a mistake but i accidentally encode a sample of a TV Capture using the old KVCD matrix for one minutes worth of capture and the resulting filesize came out smaller than the newer KVCD Notch matrix. For 1 minute of capture the old matrix made the file 2 Mb smaller. For a 2 hour film that amounts to 240MB. The details of the encode: Capture: 720x576 Mjpeg q 19 Script : PixieDust TemporalCleaner sampler(60) Encode: KDVD - 4:3 - CQ 70 My question is - do you think this is specific to my situation or is the old matrix better? Is suppose it could be Pal, or Tv capture related. I will test on a DVD rip later |
Hi jamesp,
It shouldn't. The new "Notch" matrix should produce slightly smaller file size than the older matrix, because of the lower quantization on low frequency areas. That is if you keep the same reference CQ on both templates :!: -kwag |
Thats what i thought. Will do some more tests tonight. The CQ was the same on both encodes (in fact - everything was the same apart form the Q Matrix). I only wonder if the matrix or gop structure isn't set up right on the PAL KDVD template
Quote:
|
Right, its the same for DVD encodes too. My script:
LoadPlugin("C:\Program Files\DVD2SVCD\MPEG2Dec\MPEG2DEC2.dll") mpeg2source("C:\Conversions\OrdCrim\test.d2v") Sampler(60) Peachsmoother() LegalClip() The film - Ordinary Decent Criminal. KDVD encode. The results for 1 minute: OldMatrix - 16,254,623 bytes NotchMatrix - 17,031,147 bytes Almost 1mb difference per minute? 8O Is this only with PAL? Does anyone else get the same result? Jim Quote:
|
Quote:
-kwag |
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.