.
.
well, in my experience w/ most filters that "distort" the image, be it
* smoothers
* temporals
* sharpiners
* time-differends etc.
* even color tweakers..
All these will degrade your final encode to a point, but that's not what it's
all about..
Rather, if we can tweak the final encodes to:
* produce good overal quality, and
* at the same time, provide minimal size per CDR or DVDR media.
The key is too find the
Right comination of "filtering" to achieve
the final output, w/out degrading the image too much, to the point of not
appreciating it, or considering worth while.
I think that (and would highly recommend) that we for now on include the
following, when posting a "the best script" or what-have-you, so that we
can get a better perspective of what one poster of script is saying, bla, bla
bla..
Quote:
* Source: ie: DVD project, VHS; Cable; or Sat Capture
* Capture device** : Analog vs. DV etc.
|
** this is important because this also helps us to get a perspective of what
to expect from a given script that is posted.
In short, posting a script (w/out mentioning it's origin) always leads me to
wonder, "what's this script based on" .. "dvd, or capture source ??"
I just see so many scripts being posted, but I can't place where they fit, a
lot of times. ie, is that script good for "dvd projects", or is it good for
"analog captures" etc. instead of running out and trying the script on the
wrong source. This would help to minimize the frustration of obtaining a
good encode (based on posted script) vs. "this script produces poor quality" - - like.. this script is best for VHS or Satellite caps, or dvd based
etc.. That's all.
I think this would help us out in the long run
yeah ?
-vhelp