Quantcast Avisynth: Unbelievable! the Script Hasn't Changed in 5 Days?? - Page 3 - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
  #41  
04-21-2003, 01:00 PM
PyRoMaNiA PyRoMaNiA is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: a PAL land (UK)
Posts: 408
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bman
Hi PyRo !
Best is to try coz there are no 2 identical sources out there
Try and see which one fits u more
bman
OK. Faerydust works fine for me, so I'll stick with it.
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #42  
04-21-2003, 01:29 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfi
Okej, now I can see the differces So the only temporal filter who is in use, when talking about the script for dvd and clean material, is temporalsmoother

//Wolfi
That's right, and with very low values. Too high values makes "ghosting" in the image ( Trailing images ).

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #43  
04-21-2003, 02:29 PM
Bigswaffo Bigswaffo is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Tejas
Posts: 86
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
@kwag
For a clean DVD-Rip DivX, what noise filter should I use (Space, Faery, Pixie, or Gold Dust)?

Also, on the optimal script it has a mergechorma and a mergeluma. What exactly do those do?
Reply With Quote
  #44  
04-21-2003, 03:25 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigswaffo
@kwag
For a clean DVD-Rip DivX, what noise filter should I use (Space, Faery, Pixie, or Gold Dust)?
For DivX(XviD), I wouldn't go over FaeryDust.
Quote:

Also, on the optimal script it has a mergechorma and a mergeluma. What exactly do those do?
http://www.avisynth.org/index.php?page=Merge

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #45  
04-22-2003, 02:13 PM
Kane Kane is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 398
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iŽve tried the newest script with several "types" of movies, action movies, dark movies, etc and compared it with the same script without STMedianFilter

In every try the movie without STMedianFilter had a better quality, than the on with STMedianFilter, although the cq value could be increased with STMedianFilter about 2-5

so my decision is to leave it out,
would like to hear about your results
__________________
greetz Kane
Reply With Quote
  #46  
04-22-2003, 03:28 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi Kane,

Probably even lowering the values in the filter might still keep the file size down!, while maintaining better picture quality than with the current settings
Just keep the third and fourth parameters ( temporal section ) set to 0.
Only adjust the Spatial parameters.

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #47  
04-22-2003, 03:31 PM
Kane Kane is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 398
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iŽll play a bit with this filter later, but i think i donŽt like him and he doesnŽt like me
picture with STM was always worse than without it
__________________
greetz Kane
Reply With Quote
  #48  
04-22-2003, 03:50 PM
Reno Reno is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Gotta concur with Kane.

I use STmedian if I have to, but if I can complete an encode without it, I will. Detail does drop, although the 'compression gain vs. impact on quality' ratio is better than previous filters I've tried.

Got any new revelations for us, Kwag?
__________________
"There are two rules for ultimate success in life.
1. Never tell everything you know."
Reply With Quote
  #49  
04-22-2003, 03:58 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reno

Got any new revelations for us, Kwag?
No, but if you two agree, then there's something wrong I'll do some tests by changing the spatial parameters, and see how they impact quality and file size

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #50  
04-23-2003, 12:09 PM
Reno Reno is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hey, has anybody tried Addnoise/Blockbuster with the current script? I'll give it a shot.

What settings do you recommend, Kwag?

I'm currently using-

Blockbuster(method="noise", detail_min=1, detail_max=7, variance=0.3, seed=1)
__________________
"There are two rules for ultimate success in life.
1. Never tell everything you know."
Reply With Quote
  #51  
04-23-2003, 12:24 PM
Kane Kane is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 398
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i used blockbuster with current script (for vhs) with default settings, as they are set in moviestacker.
i had a piece of movie which was more noise and artifacts than movie.

did a great job
__________________
greetz Kane
Reply With Quote
  #52  
04-23-2003, 01:10 PM
Reno Reno is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Coolness! Thx Kane!!
__________________
"There are two rules for ultimate success in life.
1. Never tell everything you know."
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KDVD: What is the preferred encoder these days? MrTibs Video Encoding and Conversion 5 12-11-2006 07:43 AM
KVCD: Unbelievable! Thank you Kwag, Dialhot, Incredible.... Odin Off-topic Lounge 2 04-07-2004 01:41 PM
CryberHome DVD 300 player failed in 28 days! black prince Players, DVRs, Media Centers 8 01-02-2004 02:35 PM
Why hasn't KVCD really picked up online? cybermage26 Off-topic Lounge 4 09-16-2003 12:02 PM
KVCD: This template is unbelievable! Easy123 Video Encoding and Conversion 0 06-15-2002 10:59 AM

Thread Tools



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 AM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd