04-21-2003, 01:00 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: a PAL land (UK)
Posts: 408
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bman
Hi PyRo !
Best is to try coz there are no 2 identical sources out there
Try and see which one fits u more
bman
|
OK. Faerydust works fine for me, so I'll stick with it.
|
Someday, 12:01 PM
|
|
Site Staff / Ad Manager
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
|
04-21-2003, 01:29 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfi
Okej, now I can see the differces So the only temporal filter who is in use, when talking about the script for dvd and clean material, is temporalsmoother
//Wolfi
|
That's right, and with very low values. Too high values makes "ghosting" in the image ( Trailing images ).
-kwag
|
04-21-2003, 02:29 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Tejas
Posts: 86
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
@kwag
For a clean DVD-Rip DivX, what noise filter should I use (Space, Faery, Pixie, or Gold Dust)?
Also, on the optimal script it has a mergechorma and a mergeluma. What exactly do those do?
|
04-21-2003, 03:25 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigswaffo
@kwag
For a clean DVD-Rip DivX, what noise filter should I use (Space, Faery, Pixie, or Gold Dust)?
|
For DivX(XviD), I wouldn't go over FaeryDust. Quote:
Also, on the optimal script it has a mergechorma and a mergeluma. What exactly do those do?
|
http://www.avisynth.org/index.php?page=Merge
-kwag
|
04-22-2003, 02:13 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 398
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
iŽve tried the newest script with several "types" of movies, action movies, dark movies, etc and compared it with the same script without STMedianFilter
In every try the movie without STMedianFilter had a better quality, than the on with STMedianFilter, although the cq value could be increased with STMedianFilter about 2-5
so my decision is to leave it out,
would like to hear about your results
__________________
greetz Kane
|
04-22-2003, 03:28 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Hi Kane,
Probably even lowering the values in the filter might still keep the file size down!, while maintaining better picture quality than with the current settings
Just keep the third and fourth parameters ( temporal section ) set to 0.
Only adjust the Spatial parameters.
-kwag
|
04-22-2003, 03:31 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 398
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
iŽll play a bit with this filter later, but i think i donŽt like him and he doesnŽt like me
picture with STM was always worse than without it
__________________
greetz Kane
|
04-22-2003, 03:50 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Gotta concur with Kane.
I use STmedian if I have to, but if I can complete an encode without it, I will. Detail does drop, although the 'compression gain vs. impact on quality' ratio is better than previous filters I've tried.
Got any new revelations for us, Kwag?
__________________
"There are two rules for ultimate success in life.
1. Never tell everything you know."
|
04-22-2003, 03:58 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reno
Got any new revelations for us, Kwag?
|
No, but if you two agree, then there's something wrong I'll do some tests by changing the spatial parameters, and see how they impact quality and file size
-kwag
|
04-23-2003, 12:09 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Hey, has anybody tried Addnoise/Blockbuster with the current script? I'll give it a shot.
What settings do you recommend, Kwag?
I'm currently using-
Blockbuster(method="noise", detail_min=1, detail_max=7, variance=0.3, seed=1)
__________________
"There are two rules for ultimate success in life.
1. Never tell everything you know."
|
04-23-2003, 12:24 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 398
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
i used blockbuster with current script (for vhs) with default settings, as they are set in moviestacker.
i had a piece of movie which was more noise and artifacts than movie.
did a great job
__________________
greetz Kane
|
04-23-2003, 01:10 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Coolness! Thx Kane!!
__________________
"There are two rules for ultimate success in life.
1. Never tell everything you know."
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 PM — vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd
|