Quantcast Avisynth: New MA Script Version? - Page 3 - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
  #41  
11-21-2003, 09:20 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by audioslave
Didn't mean to step on your toes...
Not at all
It means you're very focused on the changes

-kwag
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #42  
11-22-2003, 05:30 AM
digitall.doc digitall.doc is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia (España)
Posts: 741
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi kwag:
and thank you. At last, here's the answer to my oooold question: with higher action, and higher nf value, radius=2/nf trend to 0, and that means...
Kwag wrote:
Quote:
If the value of radius results as zero, it means that it's a high action scene, and I don't want TemporalSoften to work
So radius will be zero and so will the strength values. Thus rendering the temporal filter useless on action scenes, which is the exact effect I want, but WITHOUT turning the filter off
With radius 0 the filter has no effect, but iit's still switched "ON".
What about last two parameters?, should we test 1,2, or 15,2, or leave it as it is?.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
11-22-2003, 06:07 AM
Abond Abond is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
[ non-sense ]
Reply With Quote
  #44  
11-22-2003, 07:15 AM
nicksteel nicksteel is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 863
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
After all this, is the current posted Optimal MA script the right one?
Reply With Quote
  #45  
12-07-2003, 01:35 AM
J-Wo J-Wo is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 454
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Was wondering the same thing as NickSteel here... Not too sure but it doesn't look like the MA script has been updated to reflect any of the discussions in this thread. Kwag, have we come to a consensus on what the latest MA should be?

Also, I was wondering about the use of Limiter(). A lot of people have been dropping it because it makes some fade-to-black scenes look more like fade-to-black-with-dancing-grey-squares (at least that's what I observed). Have you given any thought to getting rid of it?

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #46  
12-07-2003, 01:51 AM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by J-Wo
Was wondering the same thing as NickSteel here... Not too sure but it doesn't look like the MA script has been updated to reflect any of the discussions in this thread. Kwag, have we come to a consensus on what the latest MA should be?
The current MA script, as posted, works just fine
Quote:

Also, I was wondering about the use of Limiter(). A lot of people have been dropping it because it makes some fade-to-black scenes look more like fade-to-black-with-dancing-grey-squares (at least that's what I observed). Have you given any thought to getting rid of it?

Thanks!
I always use limiter in my scripts. Never had a problem

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #47  
12-07-2003, 08:16 AM
Dialhot Dialhot is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 10,463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
I always use limiter in my scripts. Never had a problem
I never use it, and never had problems too

Why continue to use something that has NO benefits (and some problems...) ?
Reply With Quote
  #48  
12-07-2003, 09:49 AM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dialhot
Why continue to use something that has NO benefits (and some problems...) ?
No benefit
What happens if you get a source that has a Y range of 0 to 255
If your source is 16 to 235, it doesn't hurt to have Limiter(), because it won't clip anything. But if it does have a range of 0 to 255, limiter will clip it to the boundaries of 16 to 235, which is what we need for TV scale.

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #49  
12-07-2003, 11:26 AM
Dialhot Dialhot is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 10,463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
What happens if you get a source that has a Y range of 0 to 255
TMPGENC will limit the value itself !
We all have the option "output YUV as basic YCbCr" uncheck (it's the default). And that leads to the same limitation in the output range.

Quote:
But if it does have a range of 0 to 255, limiter will clip it to the boundaries of 16 to 235, which is what we need for TV scale.
You're right, 16-235 it's what we need. But as told just above, usign tmpgenc, the 0-255 doesn't reach the TV.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
12-07-2003, 01:31 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dialhot
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
What happens if you get a source that has a Y range of 0 to 255
TMPGENC will limit the value itself !
Right, but what about if you are using some other encoder
I didn't make the MA script specifically for TMPEG
It was designed with any encoder in mind

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #51  
12-07-2003, 02:21 PM
Dialhot Dialhot is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 10,463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
That's only "playing on the words" .

We give all the time advices that are "TMPGENC only". CQ mode is tmpgenc only. CQ_VBR also. No one will suffer with an other one

More, CCE for instance can't stand with the optimal script without a "ConvertToYUY2()" at the end. The MA script is not universal
Reply With Quote
  #52  
12-07-2003, 03:07 PM
Boulder Boulder is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lahti, Finland
Posts: 1,652
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dialhot
More, CCE for instance can't stand with the optimal script without a "ConvertToYUY2()" at the end.
Yes it can, if you've put xvid.dll or divx.dll as the YV12 decoder in the registry I believe that Helix has a YV12 decoder too.

I still wouldn't let any of those do the decoding, I trust the Avisynth internal functions a lot more.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
12-07-2003, 06:38 PM
rds_correia rds_correia is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chinese Democracy starts now!
Posts: 2,563
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boulder
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dialhot
More, CCE for instance can't stand with the optimal script without a "ConvertToYUY2()" at the end.
Yes it can, if you've put xvid.dll or divx.dll as the YV12 decoder in the registry I believe that Helix has a YV12 decoder too.

I still wouldn't let any of those do the decoding, I trust the Avisynth internal functions a lot more.
Strange thing Boulder and Dialhot, because I've ran a lot of tests with CCE 2.66 and 2.67 and our famous MA script.
But I was never able to encode a full movie even if I used KillAudio() or ConvertToYUY2...
I wounder why but CCE always starts encoding fine but it usually displays something about "illegal memory...performed by Avisynth" after a few minutes of encoding.
Please note that I allways aimed for resolutions of 544/704x576 because I noticed it worked fine with 528x576.
Anyway besides being a lot slower than CCE, TMPG is A LOT better than CCE
__________________
Rui
Reply With Quote
  #54  
12-07-2003, 07:02 PM
incredible incredible is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to incredible
Quote:
Originally Posted by rds_correia
... But I was never able to encode a full movie even if I used KillAudio() or ConvertToYUY2...
I wounder why but CCE always starts encoding fine but it usually displays something about "illegal memory...performed by Avisynth" after a few minutes of encoding.
Please note that I allways aimed for resolutions of 544/704x576 because I noticed it worked fine with 528x576.
Reinstall your Avisynth using the newest one avaiable. Second ... be shure all needed codes are onboard of your machine. I never had problems using .avs's which do serve a YV12, RGB32 or YUY2 Stream to CCE
Quote:
Anyway besides being a lot slower than CCE, TMPG is A LOT better than CCE
Depends on the Bitrate and your settings in CCE
In case of OneCD Encodings I shurely use TmpgEnc but if I do encode movies to a KDVD using a avg bitrate of ca. 2000kbit and above I use CCE mpeg2 with a fast manual prediction.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
12-07-2003, 07:41 PM
J-Wo J-Wo is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 454
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've also got something a little interesting going on... I use CCE almost exclusively now and NEVER have to add the line ConvertToYUY2() anymore. I'm not too sure how or why, but I think it may have been when I upgraded Avisynth to 2.5.3, or one of the recent betas before that.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
12-07-2003, 07:54 PM
rds_correia rds_correia is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chinese Democracy starts now!
Posts: 2,563
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
...
Reinstall your Avisynth using the newest one avaiable. Second ... be shure all needed codes are onboard of your machine. I never had problems using .avs's which do serve a YV12, RGB32 or YUY2 Stream to CCE
Hi, I was using AVS 2.52 and now I have AVS 2.53 but still I have problems with CCE 2.66/2.67.
And then I got lost on the 2nd part of your post.
Could you elaborate a bit more on what you meant by needed codes?
Thnx.
__________________
Rui
Reply With Quote
  #57  
12-07-2003, 08:54 PM
J-Wo J-Wo is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 454
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rds_correia
Hi, I was using AVS 2.52 and now I have AVS 2.53 but still I have problems with CCE 2.66/2.67.
And then I got lost on the 2nd part of your post.
Could you elaborate a bit more on what you meant by needed codes?
Thnx.
I think what incredible meant to say was make sure you have all the needed CODECS, not codes. Meaning, you need to make sure you have divx/xvid video codecs, or mp3/ac3/ogg audio codecs, etc properly installed.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
12-08-2003, 04:31 AM
incredible incredible is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to incredible
J-Wo is right!
Reply With Quote
  #59  
12-08-2003, 09:55 AM
rds_correia rds_correia is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chinese Democracy starts now!
Posts: 2,563
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hmm,
But I only use VOB sources and I encode the audio separatly to MP2 with HeadAC3...
Even stranger than the above:
Since I moved to AVS 2.53 I had to start using ConvertToYUY2 on my scripts, otherwise TMPG won't accept it.
__________________
Rui
Reply With Quote
  #60  
12-08-2003, 11:10 AM
J-Wo J-Wo is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 454
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've often found problems with avs are solved by uninstalling it completely, then reinstalling it. Don't worry, your existing plugins folder will remain intact so you don't have to redownload them over again. Also, make sure you have the latest version of mpeg2dec3.dll, which is v1.1 and availble at http://nic.dnsalias.com/mpeg2dec3.html. Ensure that you don't have any other versions of mpeg2dec lying around in your plugin folder. Also, what version of dvd2avi are you using to handle your VOBs? Could you post a copy of the avs script you're using?
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Avisynth c_.dll Version 2.5? Blubear Avisynth Scripting 7 07-19-2004 03:24 AM
Avisynth: Which version is everyone using? bigggt Avisynth Scripting 6 02-14-2004 12:05 PM
KVCD: Use Version 2 script with TV captures? nicksteel Video Encoding and Conversion 5 10-29-2003 04:16 AM
Avisynth: which version should be used? Insider Avisynth Scripting 3 05-09-2003 03:39 PM
MovieStacker: What AVISynth version? BoxOfSnoo Video Encoding and Conversion 5 03-26-2003 10:09 PM

Thread Tools



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:55 AM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd