Which *dust do You prefer?
Pixie, feary, gold, space ... (did I forgot something?;)).
At first I must say that i have no opinion on any of it. I just want to hear youre preferences (with some short explanation: why). I only will mention that I'm also pointing in fastest (with god visual results) (as everybody I thik so). Thx alot :insight: But please do not :litesbr: about it. Alwais when I point some question i this forum, people starting to fight :) |
If you would read in the docs of the dust package every dust filter got its special purpose (spatial/Temporal).
So you can't just determine a favorite in general. Its all about the source which as to be handled. But in case of Pixiedust look here http://www.kvcd.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6863 But that's a case of a capture. In case of good DVD Sources we don't need that AVS 2.0x Stuff. Quote:
Nope, here we do discuss, sometimes in a hard way, but as seen as a whole almost every discussion gots its sense and brings new conclusions ;-) Or I see it not enough sensible ... I don't know :lol: |
Yes, I've readed this post before, and i must say ... it's Icredible :lol:
Thx for a tip :) |
PixieDust with the Default values works VERY well to remove Noise from a clip, and gives great compression.
Too sad the filter is one of the slowest ever made... :mrgreen: so if you're looking for speed, you can dump Dust! |
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.