Quantcast Avisynth: Lanczos4resize - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
Go Back    digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] > Video Production Forums > Avisynth Scripting

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
04-23-2004, 04:59 AM
jorel jorel is offline
Invalid Email / Banned / Spammer
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brasil - MG - third stone from the sun
Posts: 5,570
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
the new avisynth support Lanczos4Resize.
from Resize page in :
http://www.avisynth.org/index.php?page=Resize

"Lanczos4Resize is closely related to LanczosResize (correct name: Lanczos3Resize).
The latter uses a 6-tap filter and the former a 8-tap filter to do the resizing.
The result is that Lanczos4Resize produces sharper images.
Especially usefull when upsizing a clip."

i did tests with clean sources (without upsizing) and can't see diferences.

anyone test and get better results?
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
04-23-2004, 05:30 AM
incredible incredible is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to incredible
Quote:
The result is that Lanczos4Resize produces sharper images.
Well, as we remeber my "how funny" One-Half-One filtering Thread, a sharp upscale can "fake" the eyes on the result that an image "appears" sharp "again".

But I think its a difference in sharpen "details" OR in just sharpen "bigger edges" of an image
Reply With Quote
  #3  
04-23-2004, 06:08 AM
jorel jorel is offline
Invalid Email / Banned / Spammer
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brasil - MG - third stone from the sun
Posts: 5,570
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by incredible
Quote:
The result is that Lanczos4Resize produces sharper images.
Well, as we remeber my "how funny" One-Half-One filtering Thread, a sharp upscale can "fake" the eyes on the result that an image "appears" sharp "again".

But I think its a difference in sharpen "details" OR in just sharpen "bigger edges" of an image
(this emoticon= Wow+ink= wink)

magicals, logicals and clear explanations ink
"fake" is the word that i never had found before
to express what i think about lanczos!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
04-28-2004, 10:52 PM
Fluffbutt Fluffbutt is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This might be a good post to post this question:

When going UP (video or graphic) I get best results with Lanczos or B-Spline (eg - photoshop filter s-spline).

What's a good filter to use going DOWN - dvd to vcd size. I'd imagine that it'd be different, after all we want different results. Up is creating pixels from exisiting data, down is destroying pixels. Maybe even a basic nearest neighbour will give sharper edges?
__________________
|
Meeow!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
04-28-2004, 11:03 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi Fluffbutt,

In "theory", bilinear for "Down Scaling", and BiCubic for "Up Scaling".
In practice, we use BiCubic for everything

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #6  
04-29-2004, 02:31 AM
Fluffbutt Fluffbutt is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
Hi Fluffbutt,

In "theory", bilinear for "Down Scaling", and BiCubic for "Up Scaling".
In practice, we use BiCubic for everything

-kwag
LOL

Saves changing the bat files huh!.. hahahaha.

Ok, another Q - is it better for dvd -> kvcd to have avisynth bicubic or mencoder do the bicubic (1) avisynth dvd to vcd size then mencoder encodes to kvcd or 2) avisynth servers the dvd size to mencoder which resizes and encodes)?

Oh, by the way kwag..
<suck mode engaged>
Thanks mate, you guys here are the greatest!!
<(suck mode canceled>

Also, I've just discovered (for me at least) in mencoder, -sws 6 gives better results than lanz or bicub spline.
__________________
|
Meeow!
Reply With Quote
Reply







 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:25 AM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd