CCE vs Tmpgenc vs mencoder
Ok i reqally only understand tmpge but here goes a few questions.
With tmpge i did mpeg2 and cq 90 352*480 and got a final muxed size of 1.3gb on a 90 minute movie. Same movie with CCE(don't really know how to usae it properly)i got muxed size of 2.2 gb(right on target for 2 movie dvd)(got DIKO to work finally) With mencoder(MEncodeMe) i got 550mb Now what i would like to know is with cce in order to reach the 2.2 gb i wondered if it used a cq that didn't add quality but just size like anything over 90 cq in tmpge. IN short do people like CCE over tmpge |
I use CQMATIC and Tmpgenc (never used CCE), and it always gets the size right for me.
I hope to try mencoder later on, for KDVD's too. |
Re: CCE vs Tmpge vs mencoder
Quote:
Next question ? |
Thanx Cweb
Quote:
anyway dvd-you mean output as dvd or input as dvd only also how do you do prediction |
Quote:
In fact I use CCe because is way faster than tmpgenc (not a scoop :-)) and for DVD target the result isn't better with tmgpenc. So I really do see why I will loose my time :-) Quote:
Did you look at Vmesquita's guide ? I do anything with the method he exposed there : http://www.kvcd.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5142 |
thanx Phil
reading it right now One final question on this subject from me Phil In your opinion Is tmpge cq 90 going to be the same quality or better then even CCE but it just takes longer So if time is no issue at mpeg 2 you recommend tmpge? |
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.