Quantcast KDVD: CCE + AssumeFPS(25) - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
Go Back    digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] > Video Production Forums > Video Encoding and Conversion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
08-06-2004, 02:07 AM
gamma gamma is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rotterdam (The Netherlands)
Posts: 237
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi,

Yesterday I experimented a bit with cce, as its much faster than tmpgenc and seems to provide better quality for mpeg2.

I was making a test run with an avi file, using the optimal v4 script. As the avi file is 23,976 fps and I need PAL, I add the line AssumeFPS(25) at the end of the script.

The result was a movie which length was decreased by 40 minutes . I can't see what I'm doing wrong. I've used this before, but this was with tmpgenc as encoder, and gave me no problems.

I'm using avisynth v2.52 and cce v2.67.

Thanks in advance!
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
08-06-2004, 02:31 AM
incredible incredible is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to incredible
Youre doing everything right as pitching up the framerate using assumefps(25) means a faster playback which results in a final shorter movielength. This PAL speedup is done mostly by all broadcasting stations when doing the 23.976 to 25.000 fps.

But just a assumefps(25) will bring your movie out of sync, so do add at the end of your Optimal V4 script this:

assumefps(25,true)
SSRC(44100)

If youre going to make a KDVD do change the 44100 to 48000 !
Reply With Quote
  #3  
08-06-2004, 02:50 AM
gamma gamma is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rotterdam (The Netherlands)
Posts: 237
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
hi Inc,

I would espect a reduction by at most 7-8 minutes when speeding a 2 hour movie up from 23,976 to 25 fps, as my previous encodes with tmpgenc also gave me that result. Isn't 40 minutes too much?

Quote:
assumefps(25,true)
SSRC(44.100)
I always thought I should only use this when also feeding the audio through avisynh, so i always use :

Code:
avisource("C:\movie.avi, false")
I speed up the audio using besweet, or in some cases cool edit pro.

Is this the right way, or is it better to use the code you suggested?

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
08-06-2004, 05:20 AM
incredible incredible is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to incredible
It depends on which audio codec is used in your avi container, so if a decoding codec is given by the system, you should try as Besweet would do the same when doing a 23.976 to 25.000 conversion. It pitches up and resamples to the wanted final khz audio rate. Besweet btw. also uses SSRCs library.

But youre right, when doing the audio encode in Besweet, you do gain from the best free mp2 encoding engines like mp2enc or 2lame (DSP Guru recommends mp2enc btw.)
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Avisynth: What is better? assumeFPS, changeFPS, convertFPS Prodater64 Avisynth Scripting 3 11-14-2004 01:18 PM
AssumeFPS - audio and video are out of sync Jimblob Avisynth Scripting 2 09-17-2004 10:48 PM
:: AssumeFPS :: BJ Conversão e Codificação de Vídeo (Português) 4 04-22-2004 07:05 AM
ChangeFPS vs. AssumeFPS vs Virtualdub? AgNa Video Encoding and Conversion 28 01-29-2004 08:03 PM
KVCD: Jerky Motion and AssumeFPS() ? Jellygoose Avisynth Scripting 4 06-27-2003 02:02 AM




 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 AM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd