Quick questions about HC Enc
Hello,
I have a couple of quick questions about HCEnc. Firstly does HC Enc use its own internal Q factor or CQ finding strategy and does this presumably work of the input of min and max bit rates etc. If this is the case what happens if the min figure is omitted? would HC Enc find its own minimum default setting perhaps? Secondly i am interested in performing a few batch encoding using this encoder since i have had some really good ones so far. However after reading the manual about modifying the .ini file i have to say i am a little confused as to which .ini this is or do i create one etc? Lastly can someone please post an example of a batch encoding .ini setting for use of a couple to three movies using the encoder. Thanks for the time, Blubear |
Re: Quick questions about HC Enc
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Code:
*MAXBITRATE 2500 Quote:
|
I would suggest you try using DVD Rebuilder free, it has all that you are trying to do, but in a more automated and structured way.
|
Quote:
In 2-pass mode, the results for my very low bitrate DVD (average 660 Kbit/s) was really bad compared to the CQ mode. I did not test for "normal" bitrates. |
The Pro version does have CQ mode for HC. I don't know how accurate the prediction is though.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
May be a beginner luck (this was my first usage of HC), but I did 2 DVDs with such bitrate (second was undersized by 50 MB) and a third more regular one, with 2 movies (4h36 long) that came 100 Mb undersized. BTW, I have to look at AutoQMatenc. |
Quote:
Oh!!! I forgot to mention one important feature, set your passes to 4 with AQMenc and it will only use as many passes as are required for best quality, skipping the next ones, intuitive :) |
Quote:
Ow an did i mention that AQE is based on libavcodec? Well, it is as far as i know. Party is over I'm afraid :roll: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The notch with HC was always better. |
Quote:
I ran the same tests here and even nuenc was slightly better in some scenes (mostly the lbr ones) than AutoQMat. But my comments could be biased ones... Quote:
Plus it is free of libavcodec meaning that if something goes wrong we have to wait for Hank. But if something goes wrong in libavcodec you could be waiting a couple of years and still they don't solve the issues... :? |
Just a commentary.
@ALL
Just a commentary: it's almost pointless uses AQE (AutoQMatEnc) without uses QMatOp too because in this way any libavcodec based encoder could to do it. The differential of AQE is just the QMatOp feature. I'll quote the SAPSTAR's words from another forum: Quote:
Cheers, |
Re: Just a commentary.
Quote:
|
Quote:
Which ver did you try, dont base your opinion on older versions since they definitely had problem. The new versions (still in Beta) are better in every sense, try them before making an opinion now. Remember AQMenc is still in Beta, so the newer versions have bugfixes and improvements. |
Quote:
(if you can submit that to jdobbs) Edit: And that's the same with CCE ! :x |
I'll check the behaviour and report it if necessary :)
|
Quote:
|
Now that is weird. I have the notch matrix in the matrices directory as well, it looks exactly like this (and it does work):
Code:
08 09 12 22 26 27 29 34 |
Same thing.
Look at my rebuilder.ini : Code:
MainMatrix=KVCD Notch Code:
; CCE SP Trial Version -- Encoder Control List I just wanted to see what PRO could do with HC. I will stick to the free version :o (I'm going to test the new DVDREasy now ;)) |
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.