![digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/styles/hr/misc/logo.gif){kind=logo}
|
Lord of the Rings Trilogy on one DVD
don't judge me just yet! ;)
This wasn't ment to an example of kdvd capabilities. I just wanted to have all movies on one disc for convenience. Total runtime: about 8 hours 40 minutes Audio: 160kbit Stereo (no chance keeping the original 5.1 track) Vid bitrate: HCenc @ Q6,36 Resolution: 352x576 Script: MA+shit Total size: 4,3gb (original over 20 gigs) Results ain't dvd quality (surprise!) but looks good enough on my shitty 28" tv. |
can you post any screenshots for our reference ???
|
You're right. That's not so bad at all !
|
looks decent enough, HCenc has really improved in the latest version (0.20) on the quality factor and for low BR.
|
Version 0.19 was used with those though....
|
Quote:
|
Well it's 1000 Kbps video encoding with 320*416 real resolution -> imply 3100 Kbps for 720*576 real resolution with the same bits/pixel.
|
Less than this because 720*576 is the frame resolution, not the image one (the LOTR are in widescreen). Or else you have to compare it with 352x576 and not 320x416.
Nevertheless I don't understand your point : are you saying that it's normal that the reslut is not so bad as 3100 is yet a decent bitrate to do encodes ? |
Quote:
Quote:
If you want comparison: - Professional MPEG2 encoding use 4-6 Mbps for 720*576 720*576 for real image: 0.38 - 0.57 bpf 720*416 for real image: 0.53 - 0.80 bpf - This example use 1 Mbps for 352*576 320*416 for real image: 0.30 bpf It's 20 GB -> 4 GB converstion for size but ratio for bpf is not 1:5 but only 1:2. In fact for bpf this encoding is simply like backup convertion at 50% and use certainely the same average quantizer ... |
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.