Quantcast KVCD: Problem with TMPGEnc 2.59 - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
Go Back    digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] > Video Production Forums > Video Encoding and Conversion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
11-19-2002, 06:40 PM
KingTuk KingTuk is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 107
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Has anyone else noticed a problem trying to use the LBR template and
TMPGEnc-2.59.47.155 ???

I went back to 2.58 and it encodes like it's supposed to...
Then I tried 2.59 again (same settings as I used in 2.5 and the file is always too big...
With 2.58 I can move the Quality up to 30 and fit the movie on 1cd, but with 2.59 it's still too big to fit on 1cd even if I leave the Quality at 22...
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
11-19-2002, 09:48 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingTuk
Has anyone else noticed a problem trying to use the LBR template and
TMPGEnc-2.59.47.155 ???

I went back to 2.58 and it encodes like it's supposed to...
Then I tried 2.59 again (same settings as I used in 2.5 and the file is always too big...
With 2.58 I can move the Quality up to 30 and fit the movie on 1cd, but with 2.59 it's still too big to fit on 1cd even if I leave the Quality at 22...
Seems you're not loading the KVCD Q. Matrix, and you're using the standard matrix. Check that out. I'm encoding with 2.59 fine.

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #3  
11-19-2002, 10:02 PM
muaddib muaddib is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: São Paulo - Brasil
Posts: 879
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
I'm encoding with 2.59 fine.
Hi kwag!
Did you notice any difference from 2.58?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
11-19-2002, 10:18 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by muaddib
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
I'm encoding with 2.59 fine.
Hi kwag!
Did you notice any difference from 2.58?
Speedwise, no. Feels the same as 2.58. It does have a high quality downsampling for the audio, but I haven't tried it yet.

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #5  
11-20-2002, 10:37 AM
KingTuk KingTuk is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 107
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I saved the q matrix so under 2.59 it said kvcd and had the same settings as 2.58, but still not working...
On the previous versions on TMPGEnc I can install to a new folder and then copy the KVCD templates to the template folder and everything works like a charm...
2.59 FREE version and the Plus version seem to disregard the template settings...
I have tried different movies and end up with files that are too big to fit on 1CD...
I am frame serving DivX movies to the encoder...

So for now I will stick with 2.58 until there is a reason to upgrade to a newer TMPGEnc
Reply With Quote
  #6  
11-20-2002, 11:21 AM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingTuk
2.59 FREE version and the Plus version seem to disregard the template settings...
Have you tried to manually change the GOP settings as in the KVCD templates? Maybe you're using another GOP
Also, check that the "System" tab says "MPEG-1 VideoCD (non-standard).

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #7  
11-25-2002, 10:44 AM
ckdexterhn ckdexterhn is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yes, I too have had the problem with TMPGEng 259 and the larger file sizes. I checked all of the settings, and the templates to make sure they were the same in TMPGEng 259 as I was using in 257, but the files are much larger in 259.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
11-26-2002, 01:34 PM
KingTuk KingTuk is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 107
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I was able to get TmpgEnc 2.59 to encode at a good size when I changed the stream type to MPEG-1 System (automatic).

Can you burn this type of MPEG to a KVCD or does it have to be a
MPEG-1 Video-CD (non-standard) ?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
11-26-2002, 03:35 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingTuk
I was able to get TmpgEnc 2.59 to encode at a good size when I changed the stream type to MPEG-1 System (automatic).

Can you burn this type of MPEG to a KVCD or does it have to be a
MPEG-1 Video-CD (non-standard) ?
You can try it, but I've seen some DVD players choke on that. They seem to like "non-standard" better.

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #10  
11-27-2002, 04:06 AM
Jellygoose Jellygoose is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,288
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Is that true??

I haven't noticed bigger filesizes with v. 2.59 but it's possible i guess... so you guys go back to 2.58 ?
__________________
j3llyG0053
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AVI to KVCD Guide Problem - tmpgenc configuration? FFCcottage Video Encoding and Conversion 1 04-30-2007 08:34 AM
TMPGEnc: Problem with mpg to kvcd, has no audio starforce Video Encoding and Conversion 5 12-14-2003 05:11 PM
KVCD: Tmpgenc problem? doodler Video Encoding and Conversion 4 10-02-2003 09:09 AM
TMPGEnc: Kvcd audio sync problem on pal to ntsc conversion DawnOfTheDuke Video Encoding and Conversion 2 05-30-2003 04:43 PM
KVCD: Template Problem + avisynth frameserver to TMPgenc? tcorolla Video Encoding and Conversion 1 07-23-2002 11:22 PM




 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 PM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd