Quantcast KVCD: MPEG2 with CQ_VBR at 12 Got Some Noise? - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
Go Back    digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] > Video Production Forums > Video Encoding and Conversion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
11-06-2002, 01:21 PM
muaddib muaddib is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: São Paulo - Brasil
Posts: 879
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This weekend I made 2 Disney’s movies.

First was Tarzan (89min / widescreen / 23.976fps)
- Start Template: KVCDx3 MPEG2 NTSC-Film
- Resolution: 480x480
- CQ_VBR: 15
- Sound: 128kbps
- File size: 797mb
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Second was Monsters Inc. (88min / fullscreen / 23.976fps)
With monsters inc I made 2 encodes, first an MPEG2-480x480, second an MPEG1-352x240

monsters MPEG2:
- Start Template: KVCDx3 MPEG2 NTSC-Film
- Resolution: 480x480
- CQ_VBR: 12
- Sound: 128kbps
- File size: 799mb

monsters MPEG1
- Start Template: KVCD LBR NTSC-Film
- Resolution: 352x240
- CQ_VBR: 35
- MinBitrate: 200
- MaxBitrate: 2400
- Sound: 224kbps
- File Size: 795mb

I tried the LBR cause the MPEG2 with CQ_VBR at 12 got some noises (mosquitoes, not blocks). And I never thought that a VCD resolution could look SOOOO GOOD!!! Of course it's not as sharp as the SVCD, but I barely notice it... And I got 224kbps audio quality!
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
11-06-2002, 02:38 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi muaddib,


Were these manually encoded with file prediction, or automatically with DVD2SVCD

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #3  
11-06-2002, 10:37 PM
muaddib muaddib is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: São Paulo - Brasil
Posts: 879
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
They were manually encoded with file prediction.
I didn't try the new DVD2SVCD yet. I had some bad experiences with it in the past...
But I'll try it with next movie.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
11-06-2002, 10:41 PM
muaddib muaddib is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: São Paulo - Brasil
Posts: 879
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hey kwag, did you see that you broke the 2000 posts barrier?
Man, that's a lot of posts...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
11-07-2002, 04:50 AM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
No I didn't

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #6  
11-07-2002, 12:51 PM
rendalunit rendalunit is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: san jose, Ca
Posts: 1,148
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by muaddib
Hey kwag, did you see that you broke the 2000 posts barrier?
Man, that's a lot of posts...
So did you! Oh wait- thats the year
Reply With Quote
  #7  
11-07-2002, 07:12 PM
muaddib muaddib is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: São Paulo - Brasil
Posts: 879
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rendalunit
Quote:
Originally Posted by muaddib
Hey kwag, did you see that you broke the 2000 posts barrier?
Man, that's a lot of posts...
So did you! Oh wait- thats the year
Hey ren!
Wait and you'll see... just 1840 posts left!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
11-08-2002, 08:15 PM
ozjeff99 ozjeff99 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 159
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Congratulations Kwag and to the other active members. This site as been absolutely invaluable to me. I've been able to share many home movies amongst my family and I have a great music video collection. It's hard to believe that I can do this from Down Under. Greatly looking forward to using prediction to tweak settings and getting efficiencies in storage.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #9  
11-20-2002, 12:02 PM
reman reman is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by muaddib
Hey kwag, did you see that you broke the 2000 posts barrier?
Man, that's a lot of posts...
He is getting ooolllldddd! As long as you remember what you ate last night you are okay!
__________________
Thanks!
reman
Reply With Quote
  #10  
11-20-2002, 12:05 PM
reman reman is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Does MPEG2 encode smaller files? The MPEG2 480x480 file was about the same size as the VCD file.
__________________
Thanks!
reman
Reply With Quote
  #11  
11-21-2002, 09:41 PM
muaddib muaddib is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: São Paulo - Brasil
Posts: 879
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by reman
Does MPEG2 encode smaller files? The MPEG2 480x480 file was about the same size as the VCD file.
Hi reman!

They were about the same size because I used the prediction formula to get the best CQ_VBR. If you look the CQ_VBR in the 2 encodes you will notice that the mpeg2 480x480 CQ_VBR=12, and the mpeg1 352x240 CQ_VBR=35.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
11-22-2002, 09:16 AM
reman reman is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yes, I did notice that but they are different resolutions also. I seem to recall reading some time ago that MPG2 was better at compression then 1. If you did a test on the same file and resolution, bitrate CQ etc using MPG1 vrs MPG2 I wonder what would happen? I do not have MPEG2 in my free TMPGENC.
__________________
Thanks!
reman
Reply With Quote
  #13  
11-22-2002, 12:49 PM
muaddib muaddib is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: São Paulo - Brasil
Posts: 879
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well, I did a test like this some time ago when I was trying to make kvcd work with my DVD. I can't remember exactly, but I can remember that the file size was almost the same. There was just a small difference (can't remember which one was bigger).

I use MPEG2 because my DVD can play MPEG1 only with VCD resolution. Any resolution above that I have to use MPEG2.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
11-22-2002, 01:35 PM
reman reman is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Interesting! I use TMPGenc TMPGEnc 2.56...is it worth paying for the latest version to have MPEG2? Are there problems with having multiple versions?

The REALLY big shame of this is that MPEG4 and or DivX 5.x is really far better at compression and final output given the same params. I have seen DivX 5.02 files (2hr) at 800mb that are equal to DVD.

I guess the ultimate solution is to have a DVD-R burner and make full copies.
__________________
Thanks!
reman
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VirtualDub: MPEG2 time shrinks when imported into virtualdubmod/mpeg2 kamen555 Video Encoding and Conversion 5 11-28-2004 06:15 PM
Avi a KVCD con CQ o CQ_VBR kplan Convertir y Codificar Video (Español) 6 11-10-2003 03:39 AM
Avisynth: noise reduction, lot of mosquito noise? yauman Avisynth Scripting 8 02-02-2003 02:41 PM
KVCD: Which CQ_VBR or CQ? Adder Video Encoding and Conversion 4 01-18-2003 04:16 PM
KVCD: CQ_VBR = CQ? twobit326 Video Encoding and Conversion 1 07-25-2002 11:47 PM




 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:12 AM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd