Quantcast KVCD: Slooow Moootion? - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
Go Back    digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] > Video Production Forums > Video Encoding and Conversion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
04-24-2003, 10:03 AM
Wolfi Wolfi is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wolfi Send a message via MSN to Wolfi Send a message via Yahoo to Wolfi
I think something is wrong with my avs. file It goes in slowmotion when I play the file in WMP. Should it be so The speed is like you're encodeing. But the audio is normal. Here's my script, look for errors

ConvertToYUY2()
LegalClip()
GripCrop( width=544, height=480, overscan=1 )
GripSize(resizer="BicubicResize")
STMedianFilter(10, 50, 0, 0, 10, 50)
FaeryDust()
unfilter(50,50)
temporalsmoother(1,2)
mergechroma(blur(1.5)
mergeluma(blur(0.3))
DctFilter(1,1,1,1,1,.5,.5,0)
GripBorders()
LegalClip()
#Sampler(length=24)
## MPEG size = ((Total frames/MovieTimeInMinutes)/24) * MPEG sample file size ##
TextSub("C:\Documents and Settings\Lars\Skrivbord\Tobias\Filmer\Showtime\Sho wtime_(DivX_DVDrip)_new.sub")

//Wolfi
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
04-24-2003, 10:25 AM
Krassi Krassi is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi Wolfi,

thats quite normal. The more filters, the more encoding time. The filters are also used when playing the file in WMP. Thats because its so slow .
I can't see any error in your script.

Krassi
Reply With Quote
  #3  
04-24-2003, 10:32 AM
Adder Adder is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 194
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi Wolfi

Wow thats hell of a lot of filters

I think when kwag reads this he will reply saying you don't need to use many of them with latest script

Maybe its a software issue with WMP what version are you using
Update to 9 if not using this.

Later.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
04-24-2003, 11:02 AM
Kane Kane is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 398
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
wow, torturing a divx with faerydust?

is the quality really that bad?
__________________
greetz Kane
Reply With Quote
  #5  
04-24-2003, 01:22 PM
Wolfi Wolfi is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wolfi Send a message via MSN to Wolfi Send a message via Yahoo to Wolfi
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kane
wow, torturing a divx with faerydust?

is the quality really that bad?
Actually this is my first script including Faerydust...but dont you think the resoult will look better? Or am I totaly wrong Maybe I should stick to Spacedust anyway And if I'm going to compare one clip using Faerydust and one using Spacedust, were can I see differeces, I'm kinda blind

And about the slowmotion, I'm using WMP v. 9.0

And please Kwag if you read this, witch of all these filters do you think is unnecessary

Edit: What is macroblocks and were can I find them I saw you were talking about it in another topic.

//Wolfi
Reply With Quote
  #6  
04-24-2003, 02:05 PM
vico1 vico1 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 103
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Smells like a codec prob to me.

I know when I do Xvids, I had to dump the Nimo Pack.
Maybe your havin` some of the same probs?



************************************
The Devil....is in the Details!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
04-24-2003, 02:53 PM
Wolfi Wolfi is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wolfi Send a message via MSN to Wolfi Send a message via Yahoo to Wolfi
I had some problems with xvid files so I've uninstalled Nimo for a long time ago

//Wolfi
Reply With Quote
  #8  
04-24-2003, 04:34 PM
Wolfi Wolfi is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wolfi Send a message via MSN to Wolfi Send a message via Yahoo to Wolfi
Do you think Faerydust is to much for a clean DVDrip'ed DivX file

//Wolfi
Reply With Quote
  #9  
04-24-2003, 04:45 PM
Kane Kane is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 398
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfi
Do you think Faerydust is to much for a clean DVDrip'ed DivX file

//Wolfi
i would say, yes it is.
for CLEAN divx sources i donīt even use spacedust
__________________
greetz Kane
Reply With Quote
  #10  
04-24-2003, 04:56 PM
Wolfi Wolfi is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wolfi Send a message via MSN to Wolfi Send a message via Yahoo to Wolfi
Not even SpaceDust
Does SpaceDust lower the quality?

//Wolfi
Reply With Quote
  #11  
04-24-2003, 05:03 PM
Kane Kane is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 398
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfi
Not even SpaceDust
Does SpaceDust lower the quality?

//Wolfi
if the source is really clean, then i just use the optimal script for dvd, and as kwaq wrote , the dust filters are just for "not so clean" sources.
why using a filter, that isnīt neccessary? i canīt make the video better than it is
__________________
greetz Kane
Reply With Quote
  #12  
04-24-2003, 05:04 PM
Wolfi Wolfi is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wolfi Send a message via MSN to Wolfi Send a message via Yahoo to Wolfi
That's logical

//Wolfi
Reply With Quote
  #13  
04-24-2003, 05:49 PM
Wolfi Wolfi is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wolfi Send a message via MSN to Wolfi Send a message via Yahoo to Wolfi
I know what was making my movie go in slowmation using WMP It was space and faerydust Worst was FaeryDust, really slow.
Does FaeryDust increase the output size more then SpaceDust

//Wolfi
Reply With Quote
  #14  
04-27-2003, 07:23 AM
PyRoMaNiA PyRoMaNiA is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: a PAL land (UK)
Posts: 408
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Does FaeryDust increase the output size more then SpaceDust
No. Spacedust encodes will be slightly larger.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
04-27-2003, 03:42 PM
Jellygoose Jellygoose is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,288
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I just wanted to chime in here...

SpaceDust and FaeryDust are 2 very different approaches in filtering. While SpaceDust is a very fast (and pretty agressive too) spatial filter, FaeryDust will take a very very long time, but do a very clean temporal filtering. If you don't mind the time it takes, FaeryDust is the best you can find for Temporal filtering.
I wouldn't agree if you say that it destroys picture quality of clean sources.
__________________
j3llyG0053
Reply With Quote
Reply







 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:44 PM  —  vBulletin Đ Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd