kvcd: Do you see the difference between CQ 70 and 75?
Do you see the difference between CQ 70 and 75?
|
I don't see it. Then again, I don't watch the results closely and compare them. I just know what my eyes like :wink:
|
ToK gave me a CQ 70 but the file was 674 megs, the audio is 89 megs so I can add a little CQ more, is it worth it?
|
I'd say that if you have the time to do another encode, yes. What resolution do you use?
If the movie originally has a very good 5.1 soundtrack, it might also be worth raising the audio bitrate, for example from 128 to 160kbps. |
I´m using 704x576, it´s a cartoon, Atlantis! The original audio is, Audio : 106 Mb, 156 Kbps, 48000 Hz, 2 chan., 0x55 = MPEG Layer-3, Supported
And yes, I have the time... |
I have done some toons at 704x480 and others at 528x480 and the one at 528 look a lot better must be cause the 704 template is a low to medium action template and you see the little squares with fast action toons. :)
|
Quote:
|
I agree with ovg64 :!:
It's better to go for 528x480(576), as it will let you raise the CQ far beyond 704x480(576) :) -kwag |
i'm curious CheronAph!
:wink: you use: CQ 70 , 704x576, the audio is 89 megs and can add a little more CQ :?: what is the final time of this movie? :? seems to me that can be more than 60 minutes, maybe 80 minutes, right? then i'm loosing some cos with this resolution,audio and CQ, can i put this all in 1 cd 700mb? 8O :?: |
Quote:
|
95 minutes CheronAph ?
8O i never try this resolutions and sizes . the max that i got was 480x480 with CQ66 in 82 minutes cutting final credits:!: i think that with more (re)size and more CQ means more quality, right? of course, i was doing the last Kwag's script in MovieStacker and encode in ToK after got the prediction value! am i doing something wrong? :? |
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.