DCT Filter on Moviestacker 2.0
Hi, is DCT Filter only for avisythn 2.5? or is too for 2.0? i have movistacker 2.0 and I had installed avisythn 2.5, movistacker say me that doesnt work with avisythn 2.5,only for 2.0.x!!! 8O i have interested for use DCT Filter for the Blocks in the dark areas,and then i have installed avisythn 2.0. for use this filter, but i have read here (www.trbarry.com/Readme_DctFilter.txt) that this filter is to 2.5 and i have a question: doesnt work DCT filter in avisythn 2.0.x? thanks and excuse me for my english, :oops: :roll: I am spanish :lol: thanks a lot...
|
Welcome CaLaFaT,
The filter is available for 2.0x and 2.5x. Get any filter you want here :) http://www.avisynth.org/~warpenterprises/ Saludos ;) -kwag |
And the best configuration for this filter for reduce at max. the DCT blocks in dark areas, kwag? can i use this filter with blockbuster noise,does it? thanks...Kwag :wink:
|
I really don't see any difference with or without this filter :!:
Remember, no matter how much you filter on the input, the output is finally dictated by the encoder. In this case, DCT blocks will be produced on the output, no matter how clean the source is ;) Edit: DCT blocks are gretly reduced by the KVCD "Notch" matrix. That was the whole purpose of the last changes :) -kwag |
Well, then i have only use the blockbuster noise filter, if you say that you dont see the difference with the DCT filter, it will be true..it's ok,kwag? you re the best in all! Thanks :D
|
Perdona por escribir en español :!: bueno, se que tambien hablas español, me podrias decir que significa tu ultimo post en español, 8O :? es k en ingles solo tengo nociones basicas...(o si kieres en el moviestacker español) en serio perdona....
I really don't see any difference with or without this filter Remember, no matter how much you filter on the input, the output is finally dictated by the encoder. In this case, DCT blocks will be produced on the output, no matter how clean the source is Edit: DCT blocks are gretly reduced by the KVCD "Notch" matrix. That was the whole purpose of the last changes -kwag |
|
A
Please, Kwag can you answer the next post? :wink: and sorry for write in spanish...
http://www.kvcd.net/forum_es/viewtopic.php?t=1048 |
kwag, i need the answer please...
|
Quote:
-kwag |
Quote:
|
yes... :!:
and DCT decrease the final file size then give me more CQ! :wink: i can't talk about quality cos i only did predictions and need some inputs about image using this filter. anyone test the quality? |
Quote:
The purpose of that filter is to reduce high frequency noise components from the source, and the matrix is already set with (slightly) lower output values than the normal MPEG standard matrix. Also with the new adaptive script, usually high frequency noise is not visible on low and static scenes, because the temporal filter is working very hard. So what I mean is I that only if the source fed to the script has high frequency components with visible mosquitoes (not the case from clean DVDs! ), then the filter is very usefull. But so far, I have not seen any need on an encoded MPEG with or without the filter. Unless I'm doing something wrong 8O But I recall some people actually getting higher file size using DCT filter instead of lower file size :? This was tested here some time ago. I guess I'll give it a try again with the current script :) -kwag |
Dialhot, jorel, you have said that the DCT Filter is "good" and we can test this filter, but if we want to use this filter in a script...what is the best configuration to put if there is a lot of DCT Blocks? thanks... :wink:
|
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.