digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]

digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/)
-   Video Encoding and Conversion (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/encode/)
-   -   MovieStacker: DCT Filter on Moviestacker 2.0 (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/encode/4273-moviestacker-dct-filter.html)

CaLaFaT 07-01-2003 08:58 AM

DCT Filter on Moviestacker 2.0
 
Hi, is DCT Filter only for avisythn 2.5? or is too for 2.0? i have movistacker 2.0 and I had installed avisythn 2.5, movistacker say me that doesnt work with avisythn 2.5,only for 2.0.x!!! 8O i have interested for use DCT Filter for the Blocks in the dark areas,and then i have installed avisythn 2.0. for use this filter, but i have read here (www.trbarry.com/Readme_DctFilter.txt) that this filter is to 2.5 and i have a question: doesnt work DCT filter in avisythn 2.0.x? thanks and excuse me for my english, :oops: :roll: I am spanish :lol: thanks a lot...

kwag 07-01-2003 09:22 AM

Welcome CaLaFaT,

The filter is available for 2.0x and 2.5x. Get any filter you want here :) http://www.avisynth.org/~warpenterprises/

Saludos ;)
-kwag

CaLaFaT 07-01-2003 09:46 AM

And the best configuration for this filter for reduce at max. the DCT blocks in dark areas, kwag? can i use this filter with blockbuster noise,does it? thanks...Kwag :wink:

kwag 07-01-2003 09:57 AM

I really don't see any difference with or without this filter :!:
Remember, no matter how much you filter on the input, the output is finally dictated by the encoder. In this case, DCT blocks will be produced on the output, no matter how clean the source is ;)

Edit: DCT blocks are gretly reduced by the KVCD "Notch" matrix. That was the whole purpose of the last changes :)

-kwag

CaLaFaT 07-01-2003 10:03 AM

Well, then i have only use the blockbuster noise filter, if you say that you dont see the difference with the DCT filter, it will be true..it's ok,kwag? you re the best in all! Thanks :D

CaLaFaT 07-01-2003 10:06 AM

Perdona por escribir en español :!: bueno, se que tambien hablas español, me podrias decir que significa tu ultimo post en español, 8O :? es k en ingles solo tengo nociones basicas...(o si kieres en el moviestacker español) en serio perdona....

I really don't see any difference with or without this filter
Remember, no matter how much you filter on the input, the output is finally dictated by the encoder. In this case, DCT blocks will be produced on the output, no matter how clean the source is

Edit: DCT blocks are gretly reduced by the KVCD "Notch" matrix. That was the whole purpose of the last changes

-kwag

kwag 07-01-2003 10:14 AM

Log in the Spanish forum here: http://www.kvcd.net/forum_es/index.php ;)

-kwag

CaLaFaT 07-01-2003 10:25 AM

A
 
Please, Kwag can you answer the next post? :wink: and sorry for write in spanish...

http://www.kvcd.net/forum_es/viewtopic.php?t=1048

CaLaFaT 07-01-2003 11:37 AM

kwag, i need the answer please...

kwag 07-01-2003 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaLaFaT
kwag, i need the answer please...

I replied to your PM :)

-kwag

Dialhot 07-01-2003 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kwag
I really don't see any difference with or without this filter :!:

So you should use the "on the fly" DCT filter included in ffdshow to make a test : open a video in a player, open the ffdshow config window, go to the DCT tab, and try some values. You will wuickly see the difference if you change one of the 5 first numbers :idea:

jorel 07-01-2003 05:55 PM

yes... :!:

and DCT decrease the final file size then give me more CQ!
:wink:
i can't talk about quality cos i only did predictions
and need some inputs about image using this filter.

anyone test the quality?

kwag 07-01-2003 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dialhot
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwag
I really don't see any difference with or without this filter :!:

So you should use the "on the fly" DCT filter included in ffdshow to make a test : open a video in a player, open the ffdshow config window, go to the DCT tab, and try some values. You will wuickly see the difference if you change one of the 5 first numbers :idea:

Yes, you can see the difference real time on a player or Vdub if the source has high frequency visible components, but not after you process it through the encoder with KVCD's Q Matrix :!: At least I can't :!:
The purpose of that filter is to reduce high frequency noise components from the source, and the matrix is already set with (slightly) lower output values than the normal MPEG standard matrix. Also with the new adaptive script, usually high frequency noise is not visible on low and static scenes, because the temporal filter is working very hard. So what I mean is I that only if the source fed to the script has high frequency components with visible mosquitoes (not the case from clean DVDs! ), then the filter is very usefull. But so far, I have not seen any need on an encoded MPEG with or without the filter. Unless I'm doing something wrong 8O
But I recall some people actually getting higher file size using DCT filter instead of lower file size :?
This was tested here some time ago. I guess I'll give it a try again with the current script :)

-kwag

CaLaFaT 07-02-2003 01:10 AM

Dialhot, jorel, you have said that the DCT Filter is "good" and we can test this filter, but if we want to use this filter in a script...what is the best configuration to put if there is a lot of DCT Blocks? thanks... :wink:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 AM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd

Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.