Why use KVCD for interlaced source instead of KDVD?
Given interlaced source, what advantage does KVCDX3 have over KDVD? The resolution is oddball and both support MPEG-2. Did it start as an experiment to try to increase detail?
Secondly, why use SKVCD NTSCFilm instead of KDVD? Is SKVCD, essentially, the same as KDVD but at film fps with the pulldown header trick for NTSC hardware playback? (Question isn't about MPEG1 which I think is useless for high-motion source. Unless it's film or quite old, I prefer NOT to deinterlace because it can create problems and takes longer to pre-process.) |
Re: Why use KVCD for interlaced source instead of KDVD?
Quote:
So we can get a higher CQ value to encode. It's really the best compromise between quality/resolution. You can always encode KVCDx3 as MPEG-2 interlaced, and burn it as SVCD, if your player supports it. Quote:
Quote:
-kwag |
Re: Why use KVCD for interlaced source instead of KDVD?
Quote:
|
Re: Why use KVCD for interlaced source instead of KDVD?
Quote:
http://www.dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html -kwag |
Re: Why use KVCD for interlaced source instead of KDVD?
Quote:
|
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.