digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]

digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/)
-   Video Encoding and Conversion (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/encode/)
-   -   TMPGEnc: Motion Search precision (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/encode/435-tmpgenc-motion-search.html)

PlaiBoi 06-16-2002 11:17 PM

Motion Search precision
 
Will changing the "Motion Search precision" from Normal to High or Highest actually increase the quality? Or will it just waste my time?

kwag 06-16-2002 11:53 PM

Re: Motion Search precision
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PlaiBoi
Will changing the "Motion Search precision" from Normal to High or Highest actually increase the quality? Or will it just waste my time?

There's not really that much difference in quality. Very little increase. But encoding time will be like 50% longer.

kwag

energy80s 06-17-2002 03:58 PM

Kwag, I always use "high quality" when encoding, I notice a significant difference between it and the "normal" mode. Encoding times aren't increased that much, and anything (simple) that will increase the final picture quality is always worth doing.

aderunn3r 06-17-2002 04:54 PM

the file size also comes down a bit

kwag 06-17-2002 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by energy80s
Kwag, I always use "high quality" when encoding, I notice a significant difference between it and the "normal" mode. Encoding times aren't increased that much, and anything (simple) that will increase the final picture quality is always worth doing.

What time difference are we talking?. On my machine, a source clip of 1:49 minutes takes 2:41 to compress at "Normal". At "Highest Quality", the same clip takes 5:05! That's almost twice. This is in my P4 @1.6Ghz from a clean DVD source. I don't notice that much difference in quality. Not sure on other sources.

Forgot to add. This is with the KVCD 352x240 template.

kwag

energy80s 06-18-2002 12:26 PM

Kwag, I'm talking about the "High" setting and not the very high one. There is a noticable difference in picture quality and the time of the encode is only about 25% more.

kwag 06-18-2002 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by energy80s
Kwag, I'm talking about the "High" setting and not the very high one. There is a noticable difference in picture quality and the time of the encode is only about 25% more.

Ok, I'll give it a try in my next encode!.

kwag


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 AM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd

Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.