Quantcast Bitrates: CQmatic/Calcumatic - Page 8 - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
Go Back    digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] > Video Production Forums > Video Encoding and Conversion

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #141  
07-23-2003, 02:15 AM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
@tigger,

Ok, I just did a test on a 57 minute segment, and CQMatic worked flawlessly
Starting CQ=50. Then jumped to 90, and then full encode at 90. That's the way it's supposed to work, so I assume that's the way it also worked for you. Check your log, and see if it reads something like: CQ ABOVE watermark. CQ set to 90.0
So it actually did a first prediction at 60, then a second prediction at 90, and then started the full encode at 90


-kwag
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #142  
07-23-2003, 02:22 AM
tigger tigger is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
yes , the log says this : CQ ABOVE WATERMARK SET TO 90...

well, iŽll see the final file size, hope its not TOO big now, weŽll see

after this, will do another film with cqmatic, will post every result to fix bugs and so

bye
  #143  
07-23-2003, 02:40 AM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What I'm looking for is consistent results
If say, everyone gets the same results, either below or above wanted file size, then I'm happy as I can correct the prediction factors. Right now, as it is, I'm getting final size just under the wanted size. I'm currently encoding a movie ( which was ~30MB low ) without any filters. If I get the same (or almost the same) encoded size, then I'll be even happier
I believe the way I'm doing prediction is far more precise than the other methods being used. To give you an example, I'm sampling the material every 15 seconds, for .25 seconds. That is, about 6 frames per sample. So I'm sweeping the movie with a higher granularity, instead of one second every minute, as with the usual prediction method. Not to mention that I'm not using AviSynth's functions for prediction at all It's all done directly in TMPEG

-kwag
  #144  
07-23-2003, 03:14 AM
tigger tigger is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
well encoded finally my 53 min movie, it has a size of 843 mb

but i already found my fault, in moviestacker, i used the wrong length value, well when i use the right one i think its gonna be ok )

bye
  #145  
07-23-2003, 03:28 AM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tigger
well encoded finally my 53 min movie, it has a size of 843 mb

but i already found my fault, in moviestacker, i used the wrong length value, well when i use the right one i think its gonna be ok )

bye
What did you have set
  #146  
07-23-2003, 03:49 AM
tigger tigger is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
53 min, but its 53 min 31 sec
  #147  
07-23-2003, 06:37 AM
tigger tigger is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
hmm...

cqmatic is now working and encoding smaller movies, but the filesize of the videostream is always getting too big...
i checked moviestacker but everything is ok...

cqmatic is always takin 90 as cq value , well but this value is too big, because the video stream is going to be 780mb-800mb, when i mux it with audi stream, its too big

what could that be?
perhaps i have to make a change?
  #148  
07-23-2003, 10:04 AM
NismoSX NismoSX is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I see that CQMatic adds B picture spoilage = 20 in the Rate Control Mode, even though it is set to 0 in the project. Should it do that?
  #149  
07-23-2003, 11:08 AM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NismoSX
I see that CQMatic adds B picture spoilage = 20 in the Rate Control Mode, even though it is set to 0 in the project. Should it do that?
No it should't. Jorel reported that to me yesterday, and today I'll take a look. Not that it makes a notable difference in quality!, but it should be set to 0.

-kwag
  #150  
07-23-2003, 11:12 AM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tigger
cqmatic is always takin 90 as cq value , well but this value is too big, because the video stream is going to be 780mb-800mb, when i mux it with audi stream, its too big

what could that be?
perhaps i have to make a change?
I'll take a look at this right now. I must have a wrong logic flaw in the program for some high CQ conditions
I'll encode a 57 minute clip I have, and see if I can reproduce the problem.

-kwag
  #151  
07-23-2003, 11:18 AM
jorel jorel is offline
Invalid Email / Banned / Spammer
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brasil - MG - third stone from the sun
Posts: 5,570
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i did the prediction now with using
CQMatic1.0b1 and after search for 8 times give
CQ66,32.

yesterday the 098 version give CQ66,64.




edit:
i forgot..the source tested have 32 minutes.
  #152  
07-23-2003, 12:00 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm getting fine results with my 57 minute clip (average bitrate 1814)
It did find that it had to encode at CQ=90, and it's currently at ~36% encode, and file size is 248,000KB.

I also finished two full encodes of a movie, one with the optimal script, and another one without any filters at all (just resizing in the .avs) The file difference was ~3 MB
This pretty much confirms that prediction is accurate, in the sense that it is producing a constant file size. Wanted final size is 767,644KB, but it might not be reached, which is normal because of the MAX setting of 90. But it should never go above the wanted size

-kwag
  #153  
07-23-2003, 12:07 PM
fn86 fn86 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 19
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Shit... this new version doesn't work... where can i find the older version to check, if it's a problem with this new version...

My Problem: The CQ is always 90 or CQMatic trys to find the best CQ by testing always the same CQ... that means it's an endless loop....

I've just found another problem... Now, CQMatic doesn't try to find the right the CQ... it starts with the encoding the film with any CQ! Also I select Prediction Only
  #154  
07-23-2003, 12:21 PM
tigger tigger is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
kwag, yourŽre just encoding the video stream right? later, you mux it with the audio...

encoded black knight, cq predicted war 66,81.
file size is 722 mb (audio + video)
yesterday i had 733 mb...
  #155  
07-23-2003, 02:51 PM
fn86 fn86 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 19
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hey kwag!
This BETA3 Version is much better!!!! I'd worked with BETA1... Now I haven't any problems!!!
But If there are going to be some, i'll post them!!!

Thx a lot!!!
  #156  
07-23-2003, 02:54 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks fn86
BETA 3 shouldn't get stuck on a loop anymore.

-kwag
  #157  
07-23-2003, 03:10 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If BETA 3 did indeed solve all looping problems, then the next BETA(s) will be prediction accuracy tweaks, until we're all happy
Then the "BETA" name will be gone, and 1.0 Release will be posted

-kwag
  #158  
07-23-2003, 03:12 PM
Krassi Krassi is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Did 1.0 beta 3 increase your CQ-values
Looking forward to 1.0 .
  #159  
07-23-2003, 03:14 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krassi
Did 1.0 beta 3 increase your CQ-values
Yes it will
Final tweaks to find the optimal values for prediction

-kwag
  #160  
07-23-2003, 06:33 PM
fn86 fn86 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 19
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Oh no...

There's still a problem...CQMatic doesn't try to find the right the CQ... it starts with encoding the whole film with the (first) CQ from the tpr-file, you understand?!

Help......

Mh...I have this problem with avi-files.... not with DVD-Rips....
Closed Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bitrates: CQMatic and CalcuMatic now Open Source! kwag Video Encoding and Conversion 18 07-12-2008 06:13 AM
Bitrates: Latest CQMatic/CalcuMatic epuleda Video Encoding and Conversion 2 05-25-2006 09:54 PM
Bitrates: CQMatic/CalcuMatic Continued... kwag Video Encoding and Conversion 125 12-30-2005 11:55 PM
Bitrates: CQMatic/Calcumatic? Blubear Video Encoding and Conversion 6 07-17-2004 08:53 PM
Bitrates: Success (CQMatic & CalcuMatic) jorel Video Encoding and Conversion 10 10-25-2003 08:00 PM




 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:13 PM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd