FFMPEG: Ffmpeg and windows, where are we now ?
Hi all,
Some times ago Kwag (I guess :?:) released a windows version of ffmpeg. I tested it but I droped it because th soft was still too buggy. Were are we now ? Is it possible to have a windows version of the last linux ffmeg version up to date ? Thank you. |
|
If I understand well, that's the version you still released for windows weeks ago ?
But, if that version is so bugged, how people here can use it for making KVCD ? It seems that at least russianexpart uses it. I surely missed something ;-) |
Quote:
Quote:
Unless it's for viewing on the PC, because it's a muxing mess :!: Quote:
-kwag |
First off I didn't have a problem with FFmpeg 0.4.8 it might have been a bug in the compiling of windows. But russianexpart uses mplayer (mencoder) to encoder the video and ffmpeg for the audio, but i think ffmpeg is obsolete now with mplayer 1.0pre3.
Edit: russianexpat uses a script to process the video and audio separately then puts it though a different muxer. |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
The real problem there is that my PC is on 24/7 for doing a lot of things and I don't want to switch it off just to encode a video. That's why I was looking a reliable ffmpeg windows version. But it does not exist, so I'll continue without it. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But again since I don't know your reasons I am going to shut up :) . |
Quote:
PS: I do own 2 Pc (1 P4 and 1 Athlon) but is still not enought for my needs. :-) and I doubt I can use my good old 486DX33 for encoding :lol: |
I'd love to see ffmpeg encoding on BeOS :mrgreen:
That would sweep the crap of just about any current Linux or *BSD distro :!: Shame that Be inc. sold it :( Now who knows if the OpenBEOS will ever be finished :!: :twisted: Sorry for the off topic, but I just had to say that :hihi: -kwag |
Quote:
Also that?s cool that you aren't against Linux and you?re a Unix software development engineer. Because I am trying to get a Linux certification and that?s cool that we have a lot of people on this forum that know Unix based software. |
Quote:
FYI my unix workstation at work has a 180 Mhz CPU and run a lot faster than my 1.4Ghz Pentium 4. Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
-kwag |
Quote:
I 'm currently working on HP workstation (B180) but this is just a front end to THE real piece of hardware : a V-class superdome (12 CPU, 20 GB of memory :-)) |
Quote:
Quote:
But this :arrow: http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/error.gif http://www.mosix.org/pics/index.html will make a superdome feel like an ant :mrgreen: -kwag |
Don't be offended but that kind of project makes laughting every people already involved in parallel hardware. What is the real purpose of having all this complete computers hanged up in a cupboard (do you really need all those floppy drives ? ;-)) ? To make people say "whaoooowww". And that works :-D
I worked on a PARAGON (1024 Intel i866 CPU) that has the power of a CRAY XP-1 for the 10th of the price (and yeah, I also had access to a XP-1 :-P). Other systems (do not remember the names :oops:) had up to 65535 processors. And I'm talking about machine existing 10 years ago. The G5 cluster designed by Apple do not use complete MAC G5. Only the mother boards are wired together :-) |
Kwag all those POSs make it into one big point of sale.
If computers are what I think they are. |
Quote:
Quote:
The price of the Intel hardware is very cheap :!: Are you aware that these kinds of clusters are currently being used at NASA and other science entities :?: Quote:
Quote:
Specially in number crunching applications. Quote:
So 1024 CPUs of that time is maybe the equivalent of 100 processors of the current technology today :) Quote:
I always liked Motorola's architecture ( my original training was on 6800, 6809 and 68000 processors). They are a joy to program. Not the stupid segmented Intel arquitecture :twisted: Hell, I even had more fun programming my old ATARI 800 in 6502 assembler :!: Man, those were fun days :!: ( Now I should go cry to the Nostalgia forum :hihi: ) -kwag |
Quote:
People at the Nasa don't go in the nearest computer shop and buy all the units avalaible :-) I think in your mind you are mistaken (and such photo does not help :-)) real clusters and clusturized PC (or grid compting, that is using several PC linked throught a network to do a job). Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.