Quantcast KVCD: Cutting the Encoding Time? - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
  #1  
01-09-2004, 07:29 PM
Stevis2002 Stevis2002 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 48
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
At the moment, i am running an athlon 1ghz cpu with about 380mb pc133 sdram (old system now), but what's the better thing to upgrade to encode faster? I was thinking of Athlon 3000xp cpu and pc3200 memory, but then the fx came out. Would it be worth paying the extra for an athlon fx cpu?
What would make things like encoding run faster....cpu or memory. I know you're going to say both, but 1 at a time please....With cpu comes new motherboard and big bill.

Thanks all
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
01-09-2004, 07:52 PM
Dialhot Dialhot is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 10,463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
First CPU, then Memory. But at least 256 Mo memory is needed.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KVCD: Encoding time? The Untouchable Video Encoding and Conversion 8 06-26-2005 09:04 AM
KVCD: Does CQ value effect the encoding time? andybno1 Video Encoding and Conversion 29 05-01-2003 04:07 PM
KVCD: 28 Hours encoding time? Bchteam Video Encoding and Conversion 3 03-21-2003 12:19 PM
TMPGEnc: Cutting in precise time jorel Video Encoding and Conversion 5 02-09-2003 10:52 AM
KVCD: Encoding time! Adder Video Encoding and Conversion 2 01-26-2003 10:12 AM

Thread Tools



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 PM  —  vBulletin Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd