Quantcast FFmpeg: Where do I Find FFvfw-20041301.exe? - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
  #1  
02-19-2004, 10:38 PM
poerschr poerschr is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am looking for the lastest build...can't seem to find it anywhere...

Thank You...
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
02-19-2004, 11:30 PM
Dialhot Dialhot is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 10,463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
http://www.ligh.de/software/mirrors.phtml
Reply With Quote
  #3  
02-20-2004, 03:59 AM
Hydeus Hydeus is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 322
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Personaly I do not recomend this build. It is very slow and bugy. Try last year september build. It's ~30% faster and it is more complete.
__________________
Go for SECAM =)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
02-20-2004, 05:06 AM
incredible incredible is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to incredible
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hydeus
Personaly I do not recomend this build. It is very slow and bugy. Try last year september build. It's ~30% faster and it is more complete.


Do you mean this one:

ffvfw-20030927 ??

Did you really recognised that speed advantage? As I figured out that I got less blocks with the usage of the latest 2004 build? But maybe just the "reinstall" was responsable for solving that issue

Reply With Quote
  #5  
02-20-2004, 05:18 AM
Hydeus Hydeus is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 322
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yes: 20030927.
I've tested speed 2003vs2004 on fresh installs, with the same settings. One sample: 46s with 2003, 64sec with 2004. Quality was the same, I've seen no difference, but I get no probem on 2003 with such things like 2-pass (always crash on 2004). On the other hand I dont use 2-pass anymore, it was only test But if it's buggy in one thing, could be bugy in other things.
__________________
Go for SECAM =)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
02-20-2004, 06:30 AM
Dialhot Dialhot is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 10,463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just to say that I use ffdshow (not ffvfw) for a long time and I never go above release 20031005 because all the ones after it are buggy !

It can be the same with ffvfw.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
09-02-2004, 06:08 PM
centella centella is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 64
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
or in

http://goldnet.zive.net/ffdshow/
__________________
Siempre que alguien te ayude: Da las Gracias...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
09-02-2004, 06:30 PM
Prodater64 Prodater64 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Palma de Mallorca - España
Posts: 2,925
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Last release: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/f...5.exe?download

Home Page: http://ffdshow.sourceforge.net/tikiw...w_articles.php
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FFMPEG vs FFVFW vs Mencoder ? bilu Video Encoding and Conversion 561 04-15-2004 06:16 AM
FFMPEG: lastest build - ffvfw-20041301.exe poerschr Video Encoding and Conversion 144 02-28-2004 12:20 PM
FFMPEG: Curious about H.263 in ffvfw poerschr Video Encoding and Conversion 14 02-25-2004 07:54 PM
FFMPEG: Do ffvfw and mencoder/ffmpeg give the same results? Razorblade2000 Video Encoding and Conversion 4 02-06-2004 04:23 PM
FFMPEG: XMPEG 5.03 and ffvfw kwag Video Encoding and Conversion 2 02-05-2004 10:57 AM

Thread Tools



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 AM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd