Bitrates: 352x288 CQ file too large
hi i have used tok and cqmatic but every time they find a cq to use
my file size is like 200 megs under. hell i had one move that i converted from dvd to avi then to kvcd and it came out at 90 megs at a cq of 90 and a bitrate of 1800 and a frame size of 352x288 the movie length was a 1 hour and 20 minute movie. On average its under by 200 megs. My questions is why the small sizes and would increasing the frame size work better. i'm have been using dailhot avi script for conversion cause mostly the files i use are avi's ps-- i would but this question in the other perdiction forum but i saw a lot from 2003 and very few from 2004 so i wasn't sure if any one goes there |
It's an known issue that for doing avi, CQMAtic is less accurate. But your problem here is not that.
You are using a res that is way too low ! 1h20 can be achieved in 544*576 ! And with Maximum to 2200, not 1800 :!: For these two reason, CQMatic encode always at 90 (that is the maximum CQ it uses because above that, the quality is the same, only the file size is different) : you obtained a file that can't be better (in quality) and do not need more space for that ! The ideal CQ is between 70 and 85. Use 544*576 for that movie and raise the max to 2200. Your CQ will be in this range and the result much closer than what you want. |
thanks dialhot once again eh 8)
the reason i choosed that 352x288 was cause of ur script :p On a better note should i be using resolution all the time and bitrate or is it dependant on the movie? |
Quote:
My scripts are provided with "WITDTH" and "HEIGHT" as dimensions. Quote:
|
Sorry Dailhot i just re read ur script you posted.
i was just informed wrongly my bad. it was no attempt to bash you. Sorry for being a dumb ass. If cqmatic is mainly dvd2k(s)vcd. what program would be good for avi's. tok or manual perdiction? (And hope to the green earth. i'm not posting this question in the wrong forum) there is no need to repeat ur self just a point in the right direction is all i needed. Thanks P.s.-- i know you and others put up a lot of crap form people like me. i have read and reread so much and half the time its conterdicting each other. So i formally apulagize(sp) to you for the lackluster of attempt of stupidity on my behalf. Will keep reading and reading untill i find a way to do everything. Thank you |
Quote:
|
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.