Quantcast MencodeME Obsolence and Freeenc Forum - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
Go Back    digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] > Hardware and Technology Forums > Off-Topic Lounge

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
08-12-2004, 07:48 PM
vmesquita vmesquita is offline
Invalid Email / Banned / Spammer
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,726
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi my fellow moderators,

I am no longer planning to update MencodeMe. FreeEnc is a much better solution, because it uses Windows AVIFile reading routines, which are much more reliable the libavcodec for this purpose. Also there are much more filters and scripts available for Avisynth than the internal mencoder filters. Plus it integrates with DIKO perfectly (unlike MencodeMe, but I didn't design with this purpose of course) and I really want to focus on DIKO since it can really "take KVCD to the masses" while giving some finantial reward.

So I am suggested putting MencodeMe as "discontinued", locking its forum (like it was done with ACP and TOK), and creating a new FreeEnc forum (and moving all the FreeEnc related posts to this forum). Now that the P4 thing has been fixed and Inc is getting good results, I think we should focus on this one. Also because I'll only update the library once in a while (preferabilly in the official release if they don't take too long), this will help every to achive the same resuts.

Please share your oppinions in this.

[]'s
Vinicius
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
08-13-2004, 01:02 AM
rds_correia rds_correia is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chinese Democracy starts now!
Posts: 2,563
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
HI V,
I backup your position.
Although MencodeMe is a great piece of utility, FreeENC seems to have a much better approach.
People can keep using avs scripts with FreeENC as opposed to MencodeMe and I think that's what makes the difference.
Although I feel nostalgic about it, I think you could stop MencodeMe development.
Cheers pal
__________________
Rui
Reply With Quote
  #3  
08-13-2004, 02:43 AM
Dialhot Dialhot is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 10,463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Perharps it's a little too early to close the forum anyway. There are still people that use the tool and they won't switch to freenc in one day.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
08-13-2004, 03:12 AM
incredible incredible is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to incredible
I do agree with Phil, as also many people dont want to switch over again to needed Avisynth filtering and forced avs input files.

I hink MencodeME is ok a it its now and most people anyway do tweak the commandline, means MencodeME is used as a "template" generator for commandlining enthusiasts.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
08-13-2004, 05:47 AM
vmesquita vmesquita is offline
Invalid Email / Banned / Spammer
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,726
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think you have a point, Dialhot and Inc. But what about a FreeEnc forum?

[]'s
Vinicius
Reply With Quote
  #6  
08-13-2004, 05:57 AM
incredible incredible is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to incredible
Would make sense to rename the forum "ffmpeg/ffvfw/ffshow"

to "ffmpeg/ffvfw/ffshow/FreeEnc" as all do base on ffmpeg/Libavcodec

... IMHO
Reply With Quote
  #7  
08-13-2004, 06:15 AM
vmesquita vmesquita is offline
Invalid Email / Banned / Spammer
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,726
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi Inc,

I think FreeEnc deserves a separated forum (as there is a MencodeMe and PackShot forum) to avoid confusion about what's being used by the person posting.

[]'s
Vinicius
Reply With Quote
  #8  
08-13-2004, 06:50 AM
incredible incredible is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to incredible
Quote:
Originally Posted by vmesquita
Hi Inc,

I think FreeEnc deserves a separated forum (as there is a MencodeMe and PackShot forum) to avoid confusion about what's being used by the person posting.

[]'s
Vinicius
I personally do have no problem with that I just thought about it as above as it does base on ffmpeg/libavcodec .... but youre right.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
08-13-2004, 07:24 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A FreeEnc forum is being born

-Karl
Reply With Quote
  #10  
08-13-2004, 07:25 PM
vmesquita vmesquita is offline
Invalid Email / Banned / Spammer
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,726
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cool!

EDIT:
I moved the posts, thanks for the new forum. But looks like the forum got too "Free": FreeeEnc. Could please rename the forum, Karl?
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FreeEnc ou CCE - o que usar? jorel Conversão e Codificação de Vídeo (Português) 21 09-18-2004 02:40 PM
Duvidas no FreeEnc AgEnT-sM1Th Conversão e Codificação de Vídeo (Português) 6 09-09-2004 04:51 PM
FreeEnc - Dúvidas GPhau Conversão e Codificação de Vídeo (Português) 1 08-27-2004 12:26 PM
FREEENC X CCE-SP davila Conversão e Codificação de Vídeo (Português) 0 08-19-2004 12:03 AM
FreeEnc 0.21 disponível! vmesquita Conversão e Codificação de Vídeo (Português) 3 08-14-2004 08:51 AM




 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 AM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd