Quantcast Stephanv - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
  #1  
12-29-2004, 09:53 PM
Dialhot Dialhot is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 10,463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I just discovered why this guy put me so much on my nerves, playing with my words (for him a direct show filter is a codec because it is use to encode and decode... Sir ! Yes sir ! ), jumping on anyone (especially myself) that says that Divx sucks, and never stop talking until you tell "You are right".

This guy is moderator on Divx forum !

http://forums.divx.com/eve/ubb.x?a=t...51&m=974106132
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
12-29-2004, 10:05 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Reminds me of some of the idiots of vcdhelp.com, who swear they know everything
Like those who says KVCD matrix is no good for interlaced sources
I really go (at least once a week) to vcdhelp.com, so I can amuse myself

And I agree with you 100% Phil
DivX SUCKS

-Karl
Reply With Quote
  #3  
12-30-2004, 08:19 AM
incredible incredible is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to incredible
AFAIK (now) hes also mod at virtualdub.org forum.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
12-30-2004, 08:34 AM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by incredible
AFAIK (now) hes also mod at virtualdub.org forum.
WOW, now that tells me A LOT about those site owners

-Karl
Reply With Quote
  #5  
12-30-2004, 10:59 PM
rendalunit rendalunit is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: san jose, Ca
Posts: 1,148
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
And I agree with you 100% Phil
DivX SUCKS

-Karl
me too but at least they're easier to reencode than .rm, .asf and .wmv
Reply With Quote
  #6  
12-30-2004, 11:33 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rendalunit
me too but at least they're easier to reencode than .rm, .asf and .wmv
That's for sure
Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 PM  —  vBulletin Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd