Quantcast digitalFAQ.com Support Forum - View Single Post - Archiving Video For Viewing
View Single Post
  #3  
09-25-2009, 12:12 AM
admin's Avatar
admin admin is offline
Site Staff / Media Project and Technical Adviser
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,983
Thanks: 112
Thanked 417 Times in 363 Posts
I would suggest s-video straight through the whole way -- not composite. S-video is a higher grade signal. That's where the comb filter worry comes from.

Avoiding H.264 is for standards. There really is not a set standard on H.264 yet, not for broadcast, web or even Blu-ray -- temporary standards, yes ... final, not really -- so I'd stay with something that is firmly final. MPEG-2 for DVD-Video is a final format, it won't change. There will long be legacy devices for playing DVDs, but H.264 in its current form could disappear much like Divx has. Whether Blu-ray is a force to stay has yet to be seen, early response is still highly unimpressive (think Laserdisc!). Some would argue all this, but I err on the side of "archival safety" here. Most arguers do so from the side of fanboyism and techno-geekiness, they're not thinking long-term from a realistic point of view. Go with the devil you know.

DVD specs are already above the VHS data, so you're not going to lose anything going with a DVD< now will you really gain much from converting to Blu-ray. If this were something shot in the past year on new-age tech, this conversation would be fully different.
__________________
If this site has been as helpful as a book or magazine, then Donate a few Dollars or Upgrade your Membership.
Don't forget to Like Us on Facebook or Follow Us on Twitter for special news and deals. Thanks!
Reply With Quote