digitalFAQ.com Forum

digitalFAQ.com Forum (https://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/)
-   Computers (https://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/computers/)
-   -   4K video editing PC build - is it good enough? (https://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/computers/6947-4k-video-editing.html)

mr-vhsc 01-03-2016 08:29 AM

4K video editing PC build - is it good enough?
 
Hi All,

I would be much appreciated if the experts on here could have a look at my parts list to see if this build would be good enough to handle 4K video editing and rendering.

http://uk.pcpartpicker.com/p/wf4kxr

Many thanks in advance. If you recommend any changes then please advise and also why.


Regards

lordsmurf 01-03-2016 09:19 AM

Ehh... maybe. Video likes to eat CPU, and 4k eats more before breakfast than other videos eat all day.

Skylake is the future, not Haswell. I have the new i7-6700K, and it's easily faster than the i7-5820K. Most video operations are single- or dual-core, so the main factor here is raw clock speed. It's a 4.0+ vs a 3.3+. So the 6700K in practice is about 25% faster, regardless of benchmarking (mostly non-video use).

And with Skylake, all other hardware must change: motherboard, RAM, etc.

I'd even suggest putting the video on a scratch SSD drive for editing, and only store on HDD when done. That's what I'm doing. That removes most I/O bottlenecks, which, for this exact use, is the main video bottleneck these days.

The Noctua D14 cooler is far nicer. It makes no noise whatsoever with 1 fan (all it needs) and the noise adapters. It's easily the largest part of any computer that I've ever had, going back 30 years.

I'm using a pair of 1TB SSD Samsung 850 EVOs.

That Seagate 4tb is currently the best drive. I have one now, and the other is forthcoming.

Check out the Antec Three Hundred II case. Several members of this forum like it, as well as the 300 before that.

I just finished making all these decisions myself, back in October. My main system motherboard is having problems, and it was time to upgrade my 6-year-old AMD Phenom II Quad. Total cost was somewhere between $2k and $2.5k (USD). I'm hoping to have it for 5-7 years (~$35/month max for life of the system).

Just an alternative to consider... :)

mr-vhsc 01-03-2016 09:56 AM

The 6700K has 4 cores whereas the 5820K has 6 cores. Is more cores not better?

lordsmurf 01-03-2016 09:59 AM

Nope. Cores often do not matter. It's why so many CPUs are still 2-4 cores, and no more. The software must comprehend more cores, and video software simply does not do that. Raw gHz clock speed and cache/instructions are what matter most. Sometimes you'll even find that raw clock speed doesn't matter as much as cache and instructions.

mr-vhsc 01-03-2016 10:02 AM

Many thanks for your detailed and swift response. Much appreciated. New to all this so slowly trying to make sense of all this as i go along.

By the way what motherboard are you using with the 6700K. Also i have no intention of overclocking or adding any water coolers or anything of the sort.

mnewxcv 01-03-2016 02:43 PM

What software will you be using to edit 4k?

mr-vhsc 01-05-2016 11:14 AM

i am looking to use Adobe Premiere Pro CC

Goldwingfahrer 01-06-2016 02:36 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Premiere CC Subscription inexpensively

I work with Edius V.8.1


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 PM

Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.