Quantcast 4:3 or 16:9 DVD (VHS) delivery? - digitalFAQ Forum
  #1  
11-25-2017, 08:54 AM
BarryTheCrab BarryTheCrab is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Gillette Stadium
Posts: 32
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
How do the members here prefer to "deliver" or burn their DVDs, as far as aspect ratio is concerned?
I can burn the 4:3 video as it is, or I can mask the ugly edges and center the video within a 16:9 widescreen window.
Not every player and TV act the same and I find this a little frustrating to hand over a DVD that plays nicely without the viewer hunting for proper settings.
Thank you
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Ads / Sponsors
 
Join Date: ∞
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
11-25-2017, 09:45 AM
sanlyn sanlyn is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: N. Carolina and NY, USA
Posts: 2,437
Thanks: 76
Thanked 665 Times in 596 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BarryTheCrab View Post
Not every player and TV act the same
Yes they do, with authored DVD. You have to set a player to recognize the shape of your TV or monitor. If you have a 4:3 TV, tell your player your TV is 4:3. If you have a 16:9 TV, tell your player you have a 16:9 TV. The player will play and format the video properly -- it will play a 4:3 video on a 16:9 TV with side pillars, will play a 16:9 DVD full screen. These are industry-wide standards, it's not arbitrary.

If you want to blur your image by removing letterbox bars on a 4:3 authored DVD and resizing the image that's your business, but most people don't. They play letterboxed 16:9 DVD's as-is and, if it really kills them to see a letterboxed image, they zoom or enlarge the image on their TV if necessary, but I don't -- it blurs the picture. If you enjoy watching blurry video, that's up to you. Your statement that TV's do this differently in correct only in that most players and TV's differ when it comes to resizing quality. If you want a TV that renders well, get a good one (which usually costs more than a cheapo. SONY and Samsung resize quite well if you need it).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
11-25-2017, 11:27 AM
BarryTheCrab BarryTheCrab is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Gillette Stadium
Posts: 32
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
To be clear I meant by taking my 4:3 capture, in a 4:3 editing interface, masking any rough edges, and rendering a version in 4:3 for streaming, then going into 16:9 and resizing the actual video to fit within the widescreen and burn it like that. Sometimes with a full screen blurred backdrop from the video or color-board, mostly not.
I am sure I do things you would frown upon but leaving image or video off the screen outside the borders is unthinkable, even to me!

Last edited by BarryTheCrab; 11-25-2017 at 11:28 AM. Reason: Clarity
Reply With Quote
  #4  
11-25-2017, 12:38 PM
sanlyn sanlyn is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: N. Carolina and NY, USA
Posts: 2,437
Thanks: 76
Thanked 665 Times in 596 Posts
What you're doing doesn't make much sense. Blurred backdrop? You like watching blurred stuff? But you're right, many viewers will watch anything, and if it moves and makes sounds then all the better. Some prefer less clutter and fewer gimmicks, and pretty much accept technology's limits as they exist. Some people just can't accept any part of a wide screen that isn't populated. Watching standard definition cable broadcasts and portrait-sized iphone videos must be extremely disheartening for them, but sad to say they're going to be getting upset for a very long time to come. To each his own.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
11-25-2017, 01:12 PM
lordsmurf's Avatar
lordsmurf lordsmurf is offline
Site Staff | Video
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,359
Thanks: 601
Thanked 930 Times in 835 Posts
sanlyn is a bit harsh here, but I do agree. The idea that the screen must be filled with images is OCD nonsense. If you're that insane, learn to use the zoom button on the TV. But for the actual original disc contents, respect the original aspect ratio. And don't add stuff to the sides.

At some point in the future, people will look back on the stupid/odd practice of adding colors and blurry images to 4x3 viewed at 16x9, and find it a cringe-worthy as seeing their parents/grandparents in psychedelic-colored bell-bottoms.

It will date the footage, and not in a good way.

News channels are often guilty of adding ghostly blurred crap on the edges, and it looks worse than just leaving it black matte. The only time it seems to be palpable is when GSN runs classic game shows, with those green/yellow color bars, because the 70s/80s shows were already pretty garish color-wise.

"To each is own" only works when you're doing something that only affects you. When you make a non-personal-use-only video, you're subjecting others to your bad habits.

- Did my advice help you? Then become a Premium Member and support this site.
- Find television shows, cartoons, DVDs and Blu-ray releases at the TVPast forums.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
11-25-2017, 01:18 PM
BarryTheCrab BarryTheCrab is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Gillette Stadium
Posts: 32
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
The blurred image or video (preferably image) fills the screen and makes the actual video sort of float above it. It can look really nice or be dreadfully distracting, but a simple 4:3 has plenty going for it. But I wanted to know what the norm is and 4:3 no shenanigans is certainly easier and faster.
This is mostly an aside, I just didn’t know if most folks were leaving it as is because I get different viewing results on my TVs and DVD and BR players and just want the most universal result.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
11-25-2017, 01:27 PM
lordsmurf's Avatar
lordsmurf lordsmurf is offline
Site Staff | Video
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,359
Thanks: 601
Thanked 930 Times in 835 Posts
The norm depends on use.

If it's part of a 16x9-dominated broadcast, the current ill-conceived norm is to add colors, blurred stuff, and other distractions. I really only see this happening on news channels.

If it's a 4x3 broadcast, it's usually left alone and matted.

The theory behind all this is due to plasma TVs, which were terrible, and easily subject to screen burn. But by the time anybody started to make content that appeased plasma owners, the tech was already gone. So we have this needless habit of adding stuff instead of leaving it pure black in this era of LCDs. That's why it happened, and why it should end.

The "I must fill my screen" OCD crowd is far less of a reason.

FYI: One of my extended family members is a "must fill screen" moron, who watches Fatman not Batman (all stretched and wide). And while zooming would keep the aspect ratio, that's a no-no because "it cuts off part of the picture". Argh!

- Did my advice help you? Then become a Premium Member and support this site.
- Find television shows, cartoons, DVDs and Blu-ray releases at the TVPast forums.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
11-25-2017, 02:59 PM
BarryTheCrab BarryTheCrab is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Gillette Stadium
Posts: 32
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
4:3 it is. Asked, answered.
Reply With Quote
The following users thank BarryTheCrab for this useful post: lordsmurf (11-25-2017)
  #9  
11-25-2017, 03:16 PM
lordsmurf's Avatar
lordsmurf lordsmurf is offline
Site Staff | Video
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,359
Thanks: 601
Thanked 930 Times in 835 Posts
As is the case with GSN, one of the only exceptions I find acceptable, it also depends on the content. Agauin, GSN does it during classic 70s/80s game shows that were already pretty colorful. It's not distracting, and at times even blends into the image seamlessly.

It's very subjective and heavily depends on the purpose and mood of the video. In general, it's always safe to leave it at 4x3. When you start taking artistic license, and adding stuff, you may end up both detracting and distracting for the video.

An actual important thing to pay attention to is the masking/cropping of overscan noise. When I see tape head noise and CC dots on a 16x9 image that had other editing done (adding 16x9 colors/blue, crops, etc), I want to smack the person upside the head. Bad editor, bad!

- Did my advice help you? Then become a Premium Member and support this site.
- Find television shows, cartoons, DVDs and Blu-ray releases at the TVPast forums.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
12-05-2017, 06:19 PM
dpalomaki dpalomaki is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: VA
Posts: 417
Thanks: 0
Thanked 86 Times in 76 Posts
^+1, Definitely mask the overscan garbage.

Might be worth finding out what the paying client, if there is one, expects, wants.

Many systems behave rather differently if connected via analog cables rather then HDMI. HDMI connections seem to offer less end user control over display of the image. Also, some TVs can stretch of the sides of a 4x3 image to fill the screen. (The fat ladies are singing on the sides.)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
12-06-2017, 01:54 AM
lordsmurf's Avatar
lordsmurf lordsmurf is offline
Site Staff | Video
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,359
Thanks: 601
Thanked 930 Times in 835 Posts
Yes, most players are dumb, limited options for aspect controls. But the HDTV has the aspect controls.

- Did my advice help you? Then become a Premium Member and support this site.
- Find television shows, cartoons, DVDs and Blu-ray releases at the TVPast forums.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Tags
aspect ratio, dvd authoring

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Email delivery through hosting system CasNowak Web Hosting 4 08-11-2014 10:27 PM

Thread Tools



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 AM  —  vBulletin Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd