Go Back    Forum > Digital Video > Video Project Help > Capture, Record, Transfer

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
11-01-2021, 09:52 AM
zippydan zippydan is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Is there any advantage to using a DVDR in line with TBC, or does it become overkill/counter-productive?

Right now my plan is:

JVC HM-DH40000U -> Datavideo TBC-1000 -> ATI Radeon 9800 Pro AIW AGP

I've been reading about the Panasonic DMR-ES15 as a passthrough device also providing some image quality benefits. Would it be worth adding to the above workflow? And would it go before or after the Datavideo?
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Ads / Sponsors
 
Join Date: ∞
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
11-02-2021, 09:59 AM
msgohan msgohan is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,323
Thanked 334 Times in 276 Posts
JVC HM-DH40000U already provides a line TBC and frame sync, but doesn't remove copy protection: http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/news...html#post41893

The VCR's internal TBC can't be disabled, which means adding in the TBC-1000 provides no benefit unless you want to capture Macrovision tapes. And I would argue if you want to do that, it makes more sense to use a capture card that ignores Macrovision rather than a $$$$ TBC box.

Adding a Panasonic DVD recorder or any other device to attempt external line TBC is completely useless, because the line sync information has already been stripped from the signal and re-generated.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
11-02-2021, 11:31 AM
zippydan zippydan is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I'm only copying home videos, so I don't think I need to worry about copy protection.

I found this thread which clarified that the DVR features on the ES15 only work if you can disable TBC on the VHS player, so that seems counter-productive.

I wasn't aware that I couldn't use an external TBC with that model of VHS player. Is the TBC on the JVC HM-DH40000U worse than the Datavideo TBC-1000?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
11-02-2021, 12:27 PM
hodgey hodgey is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,683
Thanked 449 Times in 385 Posts
With another VCR that doesn't feature a full frame tbc, using a DVDR can be an alternative to using a TBC unit to maintain sync and deal with the remaining instability (as long as you're not dealing with macrovision/copy protection), there is not much purpose in adding it in addition to a TBC unit though.

As noted a ES15 or similar will not be able to correct horizontal jitter/work as line TBC if there has already been a tbc of any sort in front of it as that will have replaced the non-visible part of the image used to compensate for those issues. (There are cases where the ES10/15 etc can do a better job than the internal TBCs in most VCRs as it can handle much larger errors than those are usually capable of so it's useful to have for those cases. The TBC in this model is a bit different to the ones in most SVHS decks though as noted.)
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Imation DVD-RW on Philips DVDR 3305? michelhammamet Blank Media 2 07-17-2021 06:18 PM
Advantage of using DataVideo DVK-100 as pass-through? puleddu Capture, Record, Transfer 4 01-03-2019 02:06 PM
Do I lose PQ advantage switching signal from s-video to RCA in signal path ? Mejnour Project Planning, Workflows 4 02-01-2012 05:12 AM
Multi-session dvdr question... Nannyfan Copy DVDs, Duplicate, Replicate 3 07-06-2005 09:51 PM

Thread Tools



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:42 PM