Quantcast Image enlargements: How to get detailed image for large print? - digitalFAQ Forum
Go Back    Forum > Digital Photography > Photo Processing, Scanning & Printing

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
03-03-2018, 10:37 AM
Albys Albys is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi everyone, i was wonder if there is any way to take a photo/image like the one below (or a 20/24mpx@300dpi image) and ready it to be printed on a huge format, say 10x6 meters, without losing too many details (it would be looked at from 1/1.8 meters away).

Thanks!

Photo IMGUR


Attached Files
File Type: zip resize-source.zip (208.5 KB, 0 downloads)
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Ads / Sponsors
 
Join Date: ∞
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
04-23-2018, 12:31 AM
kpmedia's Avatar
kpmedia kpmedia is offline
Site Staff | Web Hosting, Photo
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,241
Thanked 354 Times in 332 Posts
At very most, you can run a fractal resize. However, don't expect miracles. Generally speaking, a fractal resize will allow for prints about 2x-4x larger than "stupid" resize methods (bicubic, bilinear).

Let's convert to feet/inches, for my own sanity: 10x6 meters = 32.8 x 19.7 feet

That's just too big. The answer is an immediate no.

That's essentially a billboard size (14x48'). Billboard were always shot with large format cameras, maybe medium format at worst. And it took that industry year to switch to pure digital shooting, because quality wasn't there for at least a decade. My Nikon D810 shoots about 7400x4900 pixels, and would be difficult to print that large with any degree of high detail. Your source image is about 1/5th that size (1650x1100).

I mean, sure, yeah, you can print 33x20' size. But you'll lose detail, and will be obviously not-sharp from closer distances. Realizing that billboard weren't really that sharp either, seen from a road traveling at high speeds. That exact source image from Imgur will probably look terrible, from any distance.

And we didn't even talk about lossy JPEG vs. the RAW. That usually matters, too. But the size of this image is so low that even being RAW wouldn't salvage it.

- Did my advice help you? Then become a Premium Member and support this site.
- Please Like Us on Facebook | Follow Us on Twitter

- Need a good web host? Ask me for help! Get the shared, VPS, semi-dedicated, cloud, or reseller you need.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Looking for DR-1000 Image Enhancer satisfied_camel Marketplace 4 11-25-2013 05:35 PM
Prime image tbc Wineslurper Restore, Filter, Improve Quality 5 09-09-2005 08:40 PM
Prime Image 50 II Tom_n_Jonna Restore, Filter, Improve Quality 2 08-24-2005 11:22 PM
No image seen from video thienng Capture, Record, Transfer 4 04-07-2005 09:41 AM
Washed out TV image hap000 Capture, Record, Transfer 4 07-02-2004 06:45 AM

Thread Tools



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 AM