Go Back    Forum > Featured > General Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
01-29-2016, 01:09 PM
grammatico_historical grammatico_historical is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Good afternoon,

I've read some of your forum posts wherein CloudFlare is mentioned and why to avoid it (e.g., http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/web-...-multiple.html and http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/web-...tives-cdn.html).

But I just ran digitalfaq.com through webpagetest.org and found that CloudFlare is one of the CDNs you're using.

Has your opinion on CloudFlare changed since those posts?

I'm asking with sincerity. After reading those posts I'd finally decided to drop CloudFlare, but then I found that—at least according to webpagetest.org—you're using CloudFlare.

Just looking for clarification.

Many thanks,

Thomas

Last edited by grammatico_historical; 01-29-2016 at 01:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Ads / Sponsors
 
Join Date: ∞
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
02-04-2016, 09:53 PM
kpmedia's Avatar
kpmedia kpmedia is offline
Site Staff | Web Hosting, Photo
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,311
Thanked 374 Times in 341 Posts
Yep, great question.

That post was written back in 2014, when CloudFlare still had a bad reputation due to 2012, 2013, 2014 major issues in their network.

Main reason =
- Their filters weren't yet intelligent, and often blocked too much legit traffic.
- They had too many downtimes that took sites offline.
- Their default "speed" settings broke a lot of sites, mostly due to poor Javascript and CSS manipulation, and overaggrssive caching. (And honestly, this is still partially true!)

Worse yet, the myth that "CloudFlare makes your site faster" was everywhere -- but it wasn't true. It's still not true. CloudFlare makes sites ping faster, but not really load faster. It doesn't cache dynamic content, and dynamic content is always the main problem -- especially on shared servers.

The last major incident with CloudFlare was late 2014.

In January 2015, somebody (with a relation to Hostgator!) DDoS'd this site, and CloudFlare was added as a quick fix. After some conversations with CloudFlare staff (execs, not the support desk), we decided to keep it as a paid member. The CloudFlare team understood their past errors, and has been making quite a bit of progress in 2015 and 2016 to overhaul their operation -- beginning right around the time we joined them. They've also been very open to feedback to help make the system better.

Now, all this sound, CloudFlare is not a CDN!

It's a caching network. MaxCDN is an example of a true CDN. It's CDN-like, but has many missing features that you get from a true content delivery network.

The main reason to use CloudFlare is for the caching, and the DNS-level security (ie, security before bad traffic can get to your servers).

- Did my advice help you? Then become a Premium Member and support this site.
- Please Like Us on Facebook | Follow Us on Twitter

- Need a good web host? Ask me for help! Get the shared, VPS, semi-dedicated, cloud, or reseller you need.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CloudFlare Alternatives for CDN? orinoco Web Hosting 1 08-11-2014 10:21 PM
How to enable CloudFlare from within cPanel? Brent Web Hosting 0 08-29-2013 01:11 PM




 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18 AM