Go Back    Forum > Digital Video > Video Project Help > Project Planning, Workflows

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
08-14-2020, 04:10 PM
cdisimone cdisimone is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 19
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Lordsmurf has been immensely helpful in getting me started here, but as I understand he is a bit inundated at the moment, so hoping someone can help fill in the gaps.

I'm looking for tips and recommendations on a workflow from someone with experience moving between Windows and Mac when capturing and converting analog home videos. I have some functioning options I've tested out but I'm looking for the smoothest/least clunky way with as little loss in visual quality as possible.

Capturing: Windows 7 Dell Laptop with VirtualDub 1.9
Basic Editing: FCP7 on iMac 10.10.5 (mask, split, title, fades)
Converting... undecided where and with what

I got Perian working on the Mac, so I'm able to bring in HuffYUV encoded AVI files into FCP7. Just don't know if this is the best way and have some questions if it is.

1. What is the suggested video codec to use for capture for this scenario? HuffYUV? UT Video? (heard some not a fan of this and that it might have a virus?) Is it possible to capture in ProRes in Windows with VirtualDub 1.9?
2. Assuming I capture with HuffYUV, would it be better to convert that to ProRes BEFORE bringing into Mac/FCP7, or is the Perian solution keeping file as HuffYUV just fine? (Not sure what is going on behind the scenes when it's done this way.) I tested and was able to convert HuffYUV capture to ProRes using VirtualDub2 eliminating a need for Perian, so both ways work.
3. Assuming keeping file as HuffYUV and utilizing Perian, need help with FCP7 timeline and sequence settings including the various ProRes options (HQ, LT, "proxy", etc).
4. Export sequence as self-contained QT mov from FCP7 with edits as ProRes to prepare for final conversion
5. Convert on the Mac or send back to the PC? If PC, will ProRes file be ok? I'm told Hybrd/QTGMC is the way to go in either case but I haven't tried this yet.

I know FCP7 just enough to get by and do what I need to do, but I've only worked with DV files so far, so the timeline and sequence compression settings are muddy when working with other formats. I also don't understand pros/cons or even the difference between converting HuffYUV to ProRes BEFORE bringing into FCP vs letting FCP handle it, or if I should be capturing with a different codec altogether if my plans are to bring into the Mac.

Thank you!
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Ads / Sponsors
 
Join Date: ∞
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
10-17-2020, 02:26 AM
lordsmurf's Avatar
lordsmurf lordsmurf is online now
Site Staff | Video
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,503
Thanked 2,448 Times in 2,080 Posts
Still need some tips?

Getting Perian working will make the Windows>Mac lossless workflow much easier. (You can avoid the ProRes422 reencode using VirtualDub2.)

1. Huffyuv is best for you, with this Perian-enabled workflows. Not Ut (issues, always has been). ProRes422 cannot be captured to, even with VirtualDub2.

2. You can, but not required. Perian uses Quicktime.

3. I've always used the HQ.

4. Export ProRes422.

5. Depends on need. For deinterlaced, QTGMC is best. Hybrid has a Mac version, but development on it stopped. However, it's probably still fine, lots of discontinued software is. (Selur doesn't have a Mac anymore, so no dev.) I'm really not clear on how QTGMC in Hybrid works, but I'm assuming it uses the Linux version Avsiynth ported.

Huffyuv>ProRess422 quality hit is small to non-existent. The important aspect in VirtualDub2 is to edit the codec/encode properties, lower the compression level, and use YUV.

- Did my advice help you? Then become a Premium Member and support this site.
- For sale in the marketplace: TBCs, workflows, capture cards, VCRs
Reply With Quote
  #3  
10-17-2020, 09:51 AM
hodgey hodgey is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,680
Thanked 446 Times in 383 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by lordsmurf View Post

5. Depends on need. For deinterlaced, QTGMC is best. Hybrid has a Mac version, but development on it stopped. However, it's probably still fine, lots of discontinued software is. (Selur doesn't have a Mac anymore, so no dev.) I'm really not clear on how QTGMC in Hybrid works, but I'm assuming it uses the Linux version Avsiynth ported.
If you mean on MacOS it's more likely it uses vapoursynth, which works fine on MacOS and Linux.
Reply With Quote
The following users thank hodgey for this useful post: lordsmurf (10-19-2020)
  #4  
10-18-2020, 01:24 PM
cdisimone cdisimone is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 19
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Thanks. I've completely revamped the way I am tackling this since I initially wrote the original post.

Still capturing the same way, with VirtualDub / HuffYUV, but instead of bringing over to the Mac for editing, I've got AviSynth installed on another Windows machine and I'm doing my editing, titling, and QTGMC with AviSynth scripts. I haven't come across any issues so far that have required me to bring the files into VirtualDub for editing - I've been able to do everything with the scripts (so far).

At that point I am using ffmpeg command line to convert the file with edits including deinterlacing with QTGMC to ProRes422/mov ("regular" ProRes422, not LT, not HQ) for an archival version "just in case" that should be future proof for a Mac, including one that's newer and without the old Perian working (assuming I will upgrade at some point), and then converting that ProRes file via ffmpeg command line to H264/mp4.

I had also been considering doing two full separate conversions just to eliminate any potential issues ProRes might introduce rather than using the ProRes file to create the mp4 file. I know I "shouldn't" notice any quality loss with ProRes intermediate file but the time savings is really irrelevant to me when I'm running the files overnight anyway. I've done it both ways and sometimes I feel like I can notice minor differences but it's very hard to tell and probably not worth all the pixel peeping effort I went through.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
10-19-2020, 05:38 AM
lordsmurf's Avatar
lordsmurf lordsmurf is online now
Site Staff | Video
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,503
Thanked 2,448 Times in 2,080 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hodgey View Post
If you mean on MacOS it's more likely it uses vapoursynth, which works fine on MacOS and Linux.
Good catch. Without verifying, I think you're correct.

- Did my advice help you? Then become a Premium Member and support this site.
- For sale in the marketplace: TBCs, workflows, capture cards, VCRs
Reply With Quote
Reply




Tags
codecs, fcp7, mac, perian, workflow

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VHS/8mm/MiniDV capture workflow on Windows 7 Pro? lily-Zaltana Project Planning, Workflows 6 06-10-2019 09:00 PM
MiniDV/Hi8/VHS capture workflow on Windows 10 Pro? (1809) SOXSYS Project Planning, Workflows 13 05-28-2019 01:14 PM
Windows XP video 'capture' PC vs. Windows 7 video 'Edit' PC? rocko Project Planning, Workflows 5 02-08-2015 03:34 PM
PC Capture for Mac play/edit workflow Eagleaye Project Planning, Workflows 7 12-21-2010 10:33 AM
How to edit/convert DVR-MS files with Premiere Elements ? Kelly Edit Video, Audio 21 11-11-2007 01:30 AM

Thread Tools



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 PM