Quote:
have found that the "Outline" and "Detail" knobs tend to add halos and make the image look artificial, so I am leaving them off or on very slightly.
|
You really can't crank up the detailer knobs without making it look bad. If you're familiar with Adobe Photoshop, it's the same as using the unsharp mask filter, and then cranking it up to 100% at a 4-pixel depth. It will look not just artificial, but somewhat hideous. The best use of unsharp mask is 1-2 pixels max, less than 30% -- as low as possible. Improve, but don't butcher. This is simply an imaging concept, and applies equally to video and photography.
Quote:
are not in great shape (not horrible either).
|
As per other posts by users and Site Staff here, the worse the tape gets, the more worthless detailers become. The idea behind a detailer is to slightly boost the quality of sharpness on an already-good quality video. If the video is rough, grainy, SLP mode, etc, then the filter is of no use.
Quote:
Having said that, with the Proc Amp functions, I am finding that I am usually just turning down the color a tad, or adjusting the brightness to improve black levels a little. Very minor stuff, really.
|
This is about right, too. Just minor tweaks to color (up or down -- usually increases), and some black level or contrast corrections. Be VERY CAREFUL when making changes! If you're using a crummy cheap consumer LCD, or an old out-of-spec CRT, then you may actually be damaging your video. Be sure the monitor is as calibrated as possible -- use a calibration disc (example:
Avia) for the TV, and a calibration device (example:
a DataColor Spyder) for computers. You don't want to "correct" video so that it looks good on a bad monitor.