Quantcast Question about Video Soap in ATI MMC - digitalFAQ Forum
  #1  
06-11-2012, 02:07 AM
rocko's Avatar
rocko rocko is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 463
Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts
Finally got a chance to experiment with capturing on XP machine I Built with with 9600XT Card and MMC ver. 8.8 (or so)!!!..with recording preset to MPEG 2 (Following DFAQ Guide),..I was wondering what Video Soap "Combo filter" 1 and/or 2 actually do? (The Sharpen,Soften and De-speckle are obvious). Also I found out that the Video soap Preview Window size IS FULLY ADJUSTABLE all the way up to full-screen,during MPEG capture,but I don't think it's adjustable during AVI capture?
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Ads / Sponsors
 
Join Date: ∞
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
06-11-2012, 10:24 AM
admin's Avatar
admin admin is offline
Site Staff | Web Development
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,337
Thanked 631 Times in 452 Posts
The "heavy" filters are a mix of interframe (temporal) NR and intraframe (in-frame) NR.

The side effects are the same as any other intraframe or interframe NR:
  • Intraframe artifacts = softening of details, or "plastic look" as gradient tones (including skin) are posterized
  • Interframe artifacts = motion blur, aka "mouse trails"

... understanding that artifacts only become an issue when the filtering is turned up too much.

- Did this site help you? Then upgrade to Premium Member and show your support!
- Also: Like Us on Facebook for special DVD/Blu-ray news and deals!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
06-12-2012, 11:21 PM
rocko's Avatar
rocko rocko is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 463
Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts
All Things in Moderation!!,.. So what (In layman's terms) is Combo filter 1 and 2 a combination of? and what would I need to use them for?...is there any explanation on this site, or in the MMC help files???
Reply With Quote
  #4  
06-13-2012, 01:20 PM
lordsmurf's Avatar
lordsmurf lordsmurf is online now
Site Staff | Video
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 11,705
Thanked 2,139 Times in 1,840 Posts
It's not something that suggested by members here. And ATI dropped support for it later on. Outside of the "despeckle" (aka "salt and pepper") filter, which is just in-frame NR, the filters are more likely to cause dropped frames than to achieve any degree of significant improvement. The filters also tend to blur, in addition to straight NR, hence the unpopularity.

Better NR is achieved in Avisynth and/or VirtualDub. Even TMPGEnc Plus 2.5 was better!

These are a combination of: in-frame blurring, in-frame NR, and temporal NR. That's it.

The usefulness of the filters faded over time, as other post-processing (post-capture) NR methods improved. When VideoSoap filters came out, it was really quite amazing to have live during-capture filtering, and results were similar to then-current post-processing NR filters.

ATI MMC VideoSoap is still useful, but again, mostly just for the 18% despeckle on DVD-ready MPEG-2 captures.

- Did my advice help you? Then become a Premium Member and support this site.
- For sale in the marketplace: TBCs, workflows, capture cards, VCRs
Reply With Quote
The following users thank lordsmurf for this useful post: rocko (07-07-2012)
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Video Soap Preview Window too small!!! (ATI MMC) rocko Capture, Record, Transfer 1 10-02-2011 03:08 PM
Manuals for Sign Video/Studio 1 video gear, used for restoring video [DOWNLOADS] robjv1 Video Hardware Repair 1 08-20-2010 01:19 PM
Question about video archiving codec choice lucgallant Encode, Convert for discs 22 07-15-2010 07:35 AM
Question for you video techies stoogedog Videography: Cameras, TVs and Players 7 04-12-2006 02:05 PM

Thread Tools



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29 AM