Go Back    Forum > Digital Video > Video Project Help > Capture, Record, Transfer

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #21  
09-21-2018, 02:06 PM
Eric-Jan Eric-Jan is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Netherlands,
Posts: 421
Thanked 56 Times in 51 Posts
ATI AIW 9200 = 2004 in computer terms that's old
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Ads / Sponsors
 
Join Date: ∞
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #22  
09-21-2018, 02:29 PM
JPMedia JPMedia is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: East Coast, USA
Posts: 150
Thanked 42 Times in 34 Posts
After going through the troubleshooting steps I am still in the same spot.

No matter what combination of options I try my system slows whenever horizontal video output is set to 720 on the XP machine. I can confirm that I have no issues capturing 720x480 from the same source on my Windows 7 PC using the ATI 600 USB. At this point I might just need to settle with a max video output size of 704x480 when I'm using the XP PC.

My current working theory is that this issue is being caused by a hardware bottleneck. I'll report back if anything changes.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
09-21-2018, 03:44 PM
kpmedia's Avatar
kpmedia kpmedia is offline
Site Staff | Web Hosting, Photo
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,311
Thanked 374 Times in 341 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric-Jan View Post
ATI AIW 9200 = 2004 in computer terms that's old
That's just complete nonsense. It's a high-quality SD capture card that outperforms many modern/current professional cards like Blackmagic.

Video shares a lot of traits with cameras. I'll put my 2009 (decade old!) D3s against a new cell phone any day of the week. I'll stack it against many dSLRs as well, and mop the floor with them. Heck, some of my old film cameras can make many modern cams look like a POS with the right film and lighting. Its all about the quality of the tool, and knowing how to use it for best results.

Age does not equate quality.

- Did my advice help you? Then become a Premium Member and support this site.
- Please Like Us on Facebook | Follow Us on Twitter

- Need a good web host? Ask me for help! Get the shared, VPS, semi-dedicated, cloud, or reseller you need.
Reply With Quote
The following users thank kpmedia for this useful post: sanlyn (09-21-2018)
  #24  
09-21-2018, 04:59 PM
sanlyn sanlyn is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: N. Carolina and NY, USA
Posts: 3,648
Thanked 1,307 Times in 982 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPMedia View Post
At this point I might just need to settle with a max video output size of 704x480 when I'm using the XP PC.

My current working theory is that this issue is being caused by a hardware bottleneck. I'll report back if anything changes.
Many commercial DVDs are produced at 704x480, although 720 width is recommended for 16:9 DVD. But it's not much of a stretch from 704 to 720.

Some installations just have bottlenecks that are difficult to pinpoint. Don't feel alone. Many have gone over to AmarecTV for lossless capture with huffYUV. It's free and their not-free lossy proprietary codec isn't needed for lossless capture, so you don't have to ante up for it. https://www.videohelp.com/software/AmaRecTV

Last edited by sanlyn; 09-21-2018 at 05:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Tags
720x480, capture, dropped frames, ntsc, virtualdub

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HD capture issues with Intensity Shuttle: audio sync, dropped frames? koberulz Capture, Record, Transfer 5 12-04-2017 08:43 AM
Capturing and audio sync, taking another stab at it! theglenlivet12 Capture, Record, Transfer 2 05-07-2016 09:17 AM
Capturing 15mbps MPEG-2 in ATI MMC, have dropped frames? volksjager Capture, Record, Transfer 3 06-12-2014 03:25 PM
Capturing VHS with VirtualDub - audio and video out of sync. avz10 Capture, Record, Transfer 3 01-13-2013 06:25 PM
Audio video sync errors 777sp2 Capture, Record, Transfer 9 11-18-2005 03:33 PM

Thread Tools



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 AM