Hi8 capture workflow with tearing?
Hi everyone,
First of all thanks for hosting this awesome community! I've been reading through this forum for a few weeks now and I think I've come up with a reasonable solution for capturing my Hi8 tapes, but have some questions. First of all here's what I know about my tapes: I've got 11 tapes in total, all 1st gen. The Sony camcorder they were shot on is still around and in pristine condition; It was only used to shoot those 11 tapes. It's a TBC + Stereo camcorder. I've hooked up the camcorder to my TV to check out the tapes and 10 of them seem to be in excellent condition. They were all shot between 1996 and 2002. One of them doesn't appear to be in such great shape. I live in Europe, the camcorder is set to PAL and all of the tapes were shot in PAL, too. Spending money on capturing my tapes isn't a major concern, but it needs to be a reasonable expense. Going the forum marketplace route would mean spending around $1500 on capturing hardware. So ~$136 per tape, and that simply isn't reasonable to me. Plus getting it shipped here would introduce the whole customs hassle. Therefore I'd like to avoid that. I still want my captures to be good, quality wise. I want this to be a one off thing, where I'll never have to touch those tapes again. So what I've come up with is this: - Get a DMR-ES10 for TBC like signal stabilization - Buy a Hauppauge USB-Live2 as a capture device - Capture lossless into VirtualDub Can I assume that this will yield at least 90% of the quality I'd get with a Cypress TBC and ATI 600? Or are we talking much worse? Just trying to get a ballpark figure here... Thanks for your help! -robotr0n |
I've had very successful captures of Video8 and Hi8 original tapes using nothing but a Pinnacle USB-500 capture device with Hi8 camcorder built in line TBC and Vdub on Win 10 platform, Always start with basic components and look for more when you develop a problem. Crappy gear require image stabilization, good gear can get away with.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
As always, I must remind you/others that I don't use a frame TBC because I want to, or because it gives some sort of "professional quality" (there's really no such thing, seeing as how these are just consumer formats). I do it to truly extract the quality on the tape, without adding errors. It's a requirement, not optional. The only difference is that I keep my gear longterm, while you can buy/use/resell. Quote:
- DataVideo/Cypress TBC = almost zero fail rate - ES10/15 alone = some fail rate, maybe 50/50 with Hi8, as it's not a TBC - Nothing = almost always frame drop issues, therefore audio sync issues. Almost always (majority of time), not always (tiny tiny % of the time). Image stabilization is about the tape more than the gear. Followed by the playback deck (camera or VCR). But all consumer analog formats are chaos on a mylar tape, and TBCs are needed. |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Coincidentally, I gave that tape to a friend a few years ago and he connected my Hi8 camcorder to his miniDV camcorder to capture the tape through DV. Here's a frame grab from that recording, the edges don't seem to be perfect, either. The shitty quality most certainly stems from the fact that he transcoded the capture from DV to low bitrate h.264. Attachment 12703 Quote:
Thanks for your comprehensive answer to my proposed workflow! |
ES10/15 for tearing + ATI 600 USB should work.
|
Quote:
|
I'm glad you got it working, happy capturing.
|
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.