digitalFAQ.com Forum

digitalFAQ.com Forum (https://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/)
-   Web Hosting (https://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/web-hosting/)
-   -   Better web hosting for websites? (https://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/web-hosting/8076-better-web-hosting.html)

Heinken3 06-24-2017 01:08 AM

Better web hosting for websites?
 
Hello mate,

I am newbie here. I would like to know which web hosting is better free or paid? I am new so don't have better idea about hosting anymore.

Please let me know. Thanks!

rochelle 11-10-2017 06:19 AM

If you go with free hsoting service then there are limitatios on support by host and resources received. Hence go with affordable SSD shared hosting services.

Alexmorco 12-05-2017 08:05 AM

Recommendation
 
If you want to stay happy and peace of mind, then, I would recommend you to choose Cloud hosting for your website instead of any other hosting, Because, If you go with any other hosting then you will be facing server issues, site loading issues and security issues with your websites. I am using managed cloud hosting for a long time and all my websites are performing very well.

rf-harris 01-15-2018 05:38 AM

If you are building a website just for fun then you may choose FREE hosting services but if you are looking to make business or Company website then you should certainly opt for the paid hosting services. If your website is on small scale and are likely to not have lots of traffic and data then you may opt for the shared hosting which is lower in price but if you have a really big website with lots of data in it and also would have lots of traffic then you should opt for the dedicated server which is a pricier option but it would make sure that your website will keep active all the time without any issues and downtime.

AuroraUsa 01-18-2018 07:22 PM

If you are planning to host a static HTML site, it would be cheap and stable to host it all over a CDN. If you were to shift gears to something like WordPress, then a PaaS where you have less control and less responsibility would likely be ideal for a low traffic, small charity. The more control you get, the more responsibility and work you take on.

So unless you have a clear and vital reason to go with an infrastructure solution and you're interested/willing to own a stack from top to bottom, I'd go with a more plug and play approach that is why i would suggest you to check godaddy or Siteground .

Hope it helps!

jacobkevin 01-19-2018 07:37 AM

SSD AND LINUX :) you can have it from godaddy

reddygs 01-25-2018 12:11 PM

You can try linode.starts from $5 pm . all you need to have install free control panel

kpmedia 02-03-2018 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heinken3 (Post 49904)
I would like to know which web hosting is better free or paid?

Paid hosting is always better.

- At worst, free hosting is unreliable, run by kids, etc,
- At best, it has severe limits that makes it a nuisance to use. One of the only decent free hosts is x10hosting.com, which is really just a no-cost intro tier to their paid hosting at x10premium.

More important than free vs. paid is the quality of the host. Some paid hosts are just as lousy, maybe even worse than, even a bad free host.

Read this: http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/web-...web-hosts.html

Quote:

Originally Posted by rochelle (Post 51443)
Hence go with affordable SSD shared hosting services.

SSD is not necessarily a mark of quality. 10k/15k RAID and even fast SATA disks, in a RAID array, can sometimes be quite adequate. It really depends on the server setup and server population. The bottleneck is necessarily the I/O. In (too) many cases, SSD just enables the host to stuff more clients on a server, so speed gains never really happen.

Again, you must carefully pick a host!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alexmorco (Post 51753)
If you want to stay happy and peace of mind, then, I would recommend you to choose Cloud hosting for your website instead of any other hosting, Because, If you go with any other hosting then you will be facing server issues, site loading issues and security issues with your websites. I am using managed cloud hosting for a long time and all my websites are performing very well.

"Cloud" is a loose term that can mean almost anything. Everything from a mere synonym for "online" to an actual cloud infrastructure that uses N+1 redundancy, utility billing, and on-demand scaleable resource. So don't be gullible and fall for marketing hooey.

Server issues will happen anywhere, on anything. The most important issue is how often, and how the hosts responds to it. Again, quality host is important.

Quote:

Originally Posted by rf-harris (Post 52225)
If you are building a website just for fun then you may choose FREE hosting services but if you are looking to make business or Company website then you should certainly opt for the paid hosting services.

Even then, free hosting can make what's supposed to be fun personal/hobby a miserable experience. All hobbies have costs, and you can surely budget a few annual dollars to avoid headaches.

Quote:

Originally Posted by rf-harris (Post 52225)
If your website is on small scale and are likely to not have lots of traffic and data then you may opt for the shared hosting which is lower in price but if you have a really big website with lots of data in it and also would have lots of traffic then you should opt for the dedicated server which is a pricier option but it would make sure that your website will keep active all the time without any issues and downtime.

The problem is that many people don't understand what is "small" and what is "large". It's not just about visitors, but also the application in use. Resources are the real limiter. General speaking:
- Shared = few thousand or less (4 digits)
- VPS/semi-dedicated = under 1 million (5-6 digits)
- dedicated = millions (7+ digits)

But again, it depends on your code. This site doesn't have 1M monthly, but the various coding on the site requires more than VPS/semi-dedi will allow. So dedicated is needed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by AuroraUsa (Post 52268)
If you are planning to host a static HTML site, it would be cheap and stable to host it all over a CDN. If you were to shift gears to something like WordPress, then a PaaS where you have less control and less responsibility would likely be ideal for a low traffic, small charity. The more control you get, the more responsibility and work you take on.

Most likely, if you have mere HTML site, then CDN will be too complicated. And honestly, unnecessary.

PaaS is "platform as a service", and is (usually) a type of true cloud infrastructure. But it's also more complicated than mere web hosting. So again, not really something that a newbie should mess with -- not for a person still trying to decide between free and paid.

As you state, more control = more work (and more headaches!)

Quote:

Originally Posted by AuroraUsa (Post 52268)
So unless you have a clear and vital reason to go with an infrastructure solution and you're interested/willing to own a stack from top to bottom, I'd go with a more plug and play approach that is why i would suggest you to check godaddy or Siteground .

Yes, shared from hosts like Godaddy or Siteground works well. There are quite a few hosts that we've reviewed on this site, including those and others like InMotion, Stablehost, and more.

Quote:

Originally Posted by reddygs (Post 52316)
You can try linode.starts from $5 pm . all you need to have install free control panel

Linode is a VPS -- and unmanaged at that. For this person, an obvious newbie to the hosting world, that would be a disaster. Not to mention that Linode has really fallen in quality and popularity in the last 10 years. Even if I did want an unmanaged VPS, I'm not sure that's be my first or even 10th suggestion.

Something like IOzoom is superior.


... and since this thread is 8 months old, with no replies from the OP. :lock:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36 PM

Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.