digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]

digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/)
-   Audio Conversion (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/audio/)
-   -   Testing of SweetHead begins..... (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/audio/1472-testing-sweethead-begins.html)

black prince 10-31-2002 02:14 PM

Testing of SweetHead begins.....
 
Hi Kwag,

I have two DVD movies to convert this weekend. I'll give you some
feedback Sunday Nov. 3, about my results using D2S RC3 with
SweetHead. This schould be interesting. :D

-black prince

kwag 10-31-2002 02:46 PM

Hi black prince,

Just finished my first movie :D
What can I say, perfect!.
Just hope everyone has the same experience.
I like the audio quality of MP2Enc (used by HeadAC3he) beter than 2lame (used by BeSweet) :wink:
Plus HeadAC3he's optimized DLL's are an added bonus :)

-kwag

muaddib 10-31-2002 07:13 PM

I thought that BeSweet used MP2Enc too. 8O
BeSweet can serve as a frontend to toolame, but if you use besweet (not toolame) you are using mp2enc, as headac3he.

Am I drunk again? :lol:

kwag 10-31-2002 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by muaddib
I thought that BeSweet used MP2Enc too. 8O
BeSweet can serve as a frontend to toolame, but if you use besweet (not toolame) you are using mp2enc, as headac3he.

Am I drunk again? :lol:

No, you're not drunk. Not yet. It's not 2:00 AM :lol:
I was refering to the way BeSweet is used in conjunction with DVD2SVCD.
DVD2SVCD calls azid, shibatch, and 2lame.
HeadAC3he uses azid and mp2Enc.

-kwag

muaddib 10-31-2002 11:04 PM

Hummm... Now I got ya! :lol:
So, I totally agree with you. :wink:

kwag 10-31-2002 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by muaddib
Hummm... Now I got ya! :lol:
So, I totally agree with you. :wink:

Now I'm going to have a beer ( or two ) :lol:
No more posting from me tonight 8)

-kwag

rendalunit 10-31-2002 11:19 PM

Kwag,

You still have two more hours to post :D

I have a bunch of svcds that I made with DVD2SVCD and they sound pretty good- what I'm wondering is how much better is Headac3he than BeSweet (or MP2Enc than Toolame) and what makes it better- like sound not as full or not enough surround info, etc.

thnx,
ren

kwag 10-31-2002 11:25 PM

You're are right ren. Not 2:00 AM yet :lol:
So I'll post till 2:00 or till I'm drunk. Whichever comes first :lol: :lol: ( just kidding )
I like the sound quality of both encoders. But the encoding speed of HeadAC3he is much faster, because of the optimized DLL's for each CPU ( MMX, SSE, etc ).
I also think that the surround 2 ( Dolby Prologic II ) in HeadAC3he's encoded audio is slightly better than BeSweet. At least to me, it sounds better, even at low 128Kbps bitrate.

-kwag

jorel 11-01-2002 01:06 AM

yes,the sound is too "proud",
with clear basses and no distorced!
i had post about it a month ago ,but don't remember where....
i think it was here or in cdrsoft forum.......????...don't remember!....

HeadAC3he sounds better!....and fast.

:wink:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:32 AM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd

Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.