digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]

digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/)
-   Audio Conversion (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/audio/)
-   -   Toolame vs headac3he? (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/audio/774-toolame-vs-headac3he.html)

acidfire 07-30-2002 01:21 PM

Toolame vs headac3he?
 
Which audio encoder is better? :?: I have been useing toolame and the sound is good. But I have read in the forums that headach3he creates some great sound. But I have read some people are having problems with headac3he. :? So I don't know is it worth tring headach3he or should I stay with toolame. :roll: And dose useing headach3he increase the audio size higher than when using toolame? Thanks for any help. :lol:

kwag 07-30-2002 02:21 PM

Re: toolame or headac3he???
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by acidfire
Which audio encoder is better? :?: I have been useing toolame and the sound is good. But I have read in the forums that headach3he creates some great sound. But I have read some people are having problems with headac3he. :? So I don't know is it worth tring headach3he or should I stay with toolame. :roll: And dose useing headach3he increase the audio size higher than when using toolame? Thanks for any help. :lol:

headac3he uses mp2enc as the MP2 encoder. I've had EXCELENT results, even at very low bitrates. Incredibly, at 64Kbps, it sounds good!. I tried that when I encoded "The Matrix" with the Pocket PC templates. The sound is awesome, heard with headphones. Toolame is very good too, but I haven't done any comparison of both.

-kwag


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 PM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd

Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.