Unless I did something wrong, but I think I didn't :!:
It's plain and simple thing. I just went to Nero, clicked on Extras/File Encoding/Add file and then selected the output file format to be "MPEG-4 Advanced Audio Coding" and selected constant bitrate of 40Kbps, Encoder quality = HIGH and GO :!: -kwag |
Hi Karl,
I downloaded the files and heard them. You don't need to book an appointment with your doctor :lol: Anyway, watch out :arrow: the AAC file is not 44khz :!: Can you check that? Cheers |
8O true!
hey Kwag, do it again and do it right or you'll get an strike! :hihi: |
Quote:
There's NO option to do that :!: I'm going to encode the AAC sample with FAAC and with PsyTel encoders. Stay tunned ... -kwag |
Here we go:
http://www.kvcd.net/test-faac.aac http://www.kvcd.net/test-psytel.aac And again (same as in prevoius posts) the ogg file: http://www.kvcd.net/test-ogg-40kbps.ogg And the original (same as in previous posts) uncompressed WAV file: http://www.kvcd.net/test-uncompressed.wav I made sure the AAC files were encoded at 44.1Khz this time. Tha FAAC is total crap at low bitrates :!: The PsyTel is very good, but missing WAY too many of the high frequency spectrum frequencies. -kwag |
Quote:
Totally agree with your Psytel and FAAC remarks. But the question will remain: how would Nero perform if there was a way of configuring it NOT to downsample... Anyway, I don't think it would overcome Ogg quality. Indeed Ogg is too damn close to MP3 at the present time. I've been very quiet about this, but I am also very much interested in music compression. I always keep my eyes in Hydrogenaudio forums too. But Ogg compatibility is still an issue. Let me put it this way: Ogg would stand in the MPEG-4 place as MP3 would stand in KVCD place. Much more compatibility with KVCD than with MPEG-4 at the moment being right ;-) So I'll stick with MP3 :arrow: for now :!: :) As soon as it comes up in every "box" I can buy at (what's the name? Radioshack?), then I'll move over to Ogg. I won't be doing the same with MPEG-4 vs KVCD, 'cause I moved on to something much better :arrow: KDVD :lol: Cheers |
sorry...i can't download that file http://www.kvcd.net/test-faac.aac
trying at 15 minutes and he don't came! :( |
Quote:
Wrong file name :? Try it again :!: -kwag |
@Rui,
Here's a list of current hardware players with vorbis support :) http://www.ogghelp.com/ogg/hardware.cfm -kwag |
Quote:
@ Correia :lol: you still with mp3? you're a liar!!!! :rotf: (kiddin) :arrow: how did you test the file if was with wrong name and nobody could download it? :hihi: |
Quote:
And I accidentally opened the older test-aac-40kbps.mp4 thinking that it was the FAAC file. Dear me, my desktop looks like my trashcan... :( Sorry about the mistake :oops: I'll give it a try now. And yes, I still think MP3 is the way to go until I can find as many Ogg compatible players as MP3 players. But I really like the "agudos" (only know the word in Portuguese) in Ogg in LBR :D. @Karl Thanks for the link :D I'll check what babies I could buy me with Ogg support. Maybe my wife would present me with a Ogg player for Christmas :lol: Cheers all |
Quote:
My sister's-in-law cat sounds better than that. And believe the cat DOES sound BAD :lol: I'll stick with MP3 for now and I'll play a bit with Ogg once in a while. At least until Ahead fixes the AAC encoding engine, right? Then maybe we can do a match against them again. Cheers guys |
i was kidding...you know! :lol: :wink:
i saw that you need 10 seconds to open one page in another thread.....seems good cos for me need 30 seconds to 1 minute(when open) 8O sometimes posting answers i loose everything and have to write all again......seems local problems(in my city)! :( |
Quote:
@Karl This one seems better :) http://wiki.xiph.org/VorbisHardware |
Quote:
|
Quote:
thanks for the link! |
my opinion:
test-faac: all underwater 8O (glub,glub) ... or my file is corrupt? test-psytel: horrible! :corky: test-ogg-40kb : winner ! really better. :wink: |
Wow kwag... I don't know what you did wrong, but all AAC that you posted are really :puke: :puke: :puke:
Here is a properly encoded AAC (from that wav) @ 40kbps: test-nero-aac-40kbps.mp4 |
thanks muaddib! :wink:
my impression from muaddib's sample "test-nero-aac-40kb.mp4" : horrible ! the Kwag's sample "test-ogg-40kb.ogg" : still winner ! |
Hi muaddib,
Look at your file, and you'll see that it's encoded at 22Khz :) Same thing happened to me :!: And there are no high frequency details on that AAC file, compared to the Vorbis sample, which is rich in high frequency details. Edit: WinAmp plays it at 22Khz, but foobar2000 does identify it as 44.1Khz 8O Play it again jorel, it does sound good under foobar2000 :!: -kwag |
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.