digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]

digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/)
-   Avisynth Scripting (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/avisynth/)
-   -   Avisynth: using the MA-script ... suggestions? (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/avisynth/13058-avisynth-ma-script.html)

jeo 12-20-2004 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dialhot
PAL is okay :D

right!
means that i can encode musicals in 29,97 mpeg1 (ntsc) and "normal" movies in pal-G :?: ...as i never did a pal encode i don't know how it will show in my pal-M tv that have different standard of palG.
i told you....more ideas .....and about ac3 and if i can author that mpe1 29,97 mpeg1 and "normal" movies in standard G together in some author program if all are mpeg1 encodes :?: :?

edited:
we posted at the same time Boulder!

Boulder 12-20-2004 09:42 AM

Even if you converted it to PAL, it would still be interlaced, so it's a no-go.

jeo 12-20-2004 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boulder
Even if you converted it to PAL, it would still be interlaced, so it's a no-go.

ok....then this is the "solution"?
Quote:

Originally Posted by Boulder
converting the interlaced 29.97fps stream into progressive 23.976fps

or have any other way?

Boulder 12-20-2004 09:59 AM

If you want to use MPEG-1, you'll have to do the 29.97->23.976 conversion. There's the sticky thread Kwag started which includes both the original (fast, good quality) function and the further developed one (slow, better quality).

jeo 12-20-2004 06:25 PM

ok thanks....!
i need to test it after restore my whole system (thunders damage 2 hdds here)......next week i will start and (maybe) more doubts will came!
please,...nobody answer me about AC3....is possible to use :?: (seems ok but i need to be right)

edited:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Boulder
There's the sticky thread Kwag started which includes both the original (fast, good quality) function and the further developed one (slow, better quality).

where is it please? (some days out of the forum and i loose some news)

Dialhot 12-20-2004 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeo
nobody answer me about AC3....is possible to use :?:

ac3 with MPEG1 you mean ? Yes it's possible. Let remember that all this will be muxed in a vob. A vob can contains either DTS if you want !

Quote:

where is it please? (some days out of the forum and i loose some news)
News ? :lol:
http://www.kvcd.net/forum/viewforum.php?f=38

jeo 12-21-2004 07:28 AM

if you don't mind Phil, :oops: let me ask for the right place where Boulder told about "sticky thread Kwag started which includes both the original (fast, good quality) function.."...i can't find that option for "fast,good quality"....please send me to the right place!
thanks to answer about ac3 with mpeg1, will be great use it :wink: and if you want delete this "too big" group of questions .....BR! (best regards)

Boulder 12-21-2004 07:37 AM

The original Convert60ito24p function is here : http://www.kvcd.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8678 , in the first post by Kwag. It produces good quality and it's quite fast. However, I would use either KernelBob or TDeint's bobbing capability instead of a standard Bob() in the script.

I posted the further developed version in that thread later. It's much slower but produces better quality.

jeo 12-21-2004 09:13 AM

Converts 60fps Video into 24fps
cool thread (saved). thanks! :)

Leksa 12-21-2004 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeo

he can do in mpeg1 with this resolution :?: (i'm really uncertain) :?

No I can't do MPEG1 with this resolution. I'm doing like Boulder and Dialhot said, muxing as SVCD.

I'm having problem with the prediction with the new CQMatic (1.3.10) and TMPGEnc (2.524), I'm getting a different CQ- value everytime I encode (no change of settings). Can someone confirm this or am I the only one having this problem?

kwag 12-21-2004 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leksa
I'm having problem with the prediction with the new CQMatic (1.3.10) and TMPGEnc (2.524), I'm getting a different CQ- value everytime I encode (no change of settings). Can someone confirm this or am I the only one having this problem?

I'm working on a new version of CQMatic.
Stick around ;)

-kwag

Leksa 12-21-2004 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kwag
I'm working on a new version of CQMatic.
Stick around ;)

-kwag

I will!

Until then I'll just continue testing and experimenting with the current version(s). 8O

Leksa 01-01-2005 12:16 PM

Finally got the time to encode the movie. Final cq 67 with 128kbps audio and resolution at 480*576. The picture is of course a bit soft because of the settings used but well watchable.

The new version of CQMatic works like charm! It almost gave perfect fit, with a slight overburn I was able to put the movie on one 80min CD. :D


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:42 AM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd

Site design, images and content © 2002-2026 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2026 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.