digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]

digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/)
-   Avisynth Scripting (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/avisynth/)
-   -   Avisynth: Optimal Script? (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/avisynth/13092-avisynth-optimal-script.html)

rds_correia 01-04-2005 02:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Icarus3000
Dialhot:

Can you post a link to the thread that discusses YOUR latest optimal script?

Grab it here Icarus :) http://www.kvcd.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=14790

I edited your post rui because Icarus asked for my script for one movie DVD, not for AVI->KVCD
Phil

incredible 01-04-2005 04:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kwag
Time for me to fix that :!:
I'll get on it after I finish some CQMatic stuff ;)

-kwag

Karl, once I did generate a script which recognises Scenechanges (exclusive fast motions for shure ;) ) and the Framenumbers where written into a text file using the filewriter command in avisynth.

The logic for detecting a REAL SC was to calculate the average between ydifferencetonext() and ydifferencefromprevious() .... that works.
Ill send you the script this week. :)

kwag 01-04-2005 10:00 AM

Ok thanks Andrej :)

-kwag

Shibblet 01-04-2005 03:50 PM

So, DialHot, I checked out the link to your script.

The script you have is pretty much just RemoveGrain, Temporal Soften, and Deen.

Do you prefer to not use the Linear Adaptive Motion Filtering?

Dialhot 01-04-2005 05:06 PM

Yes it is. That is exactly what I told you twice yet :-)

At least I can't stand the fuzzy effect introduced by the current script. Trust me or not but I can distinguish it after half a second of camera movement. That is a lot too boring to be watched.

kwag 01-04-2005 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dialhot
At least I can't stand the fuzzy effect introduced by the current script.

Then why don't you change the values, so the blurring treshold happens only after a very high movement :?:
The way it's set now, it does start to take effect on medium action.
So it's just a matter of changing it to kick in at a higher activity point.

-kwag

Dialhot 01-04-2005 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kwag
Then why don't you change the values, so the blurring treshold happens only after a very high movement :?:

Because the values that pleased my eyes didn't please the 800 MB I had on a KVCD :-). I'd try again now as I do at most 3-movie DVD and that gives twice the space for each movie. I'll give this a chance next time I encode a movie.

Shibblet 01-05-2005 03:17 AM

I can see the fuzzy effect too, however, I am constantly having issues with RemoveGrainS.

This is the only one that I can actually use. I am running an Athlon XP, so the SSE version, and the RemoveGrain version will not actually function.

The problems with RemoveGrainS add to the linear motion issue badly, and seem to cause one toned skin and background areas (kind of like an old lady wearing too much makeup, ie. Cher)

I have been adjusting the values, but I thought you told me once before that UnDot will do the same thing.

Dialhot 01-05-2005 04:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shibblet
I have been adjusting the values, but I thought you told me once before that UnDot will do the same thing.

Undot is equivalent to (D)RemoveGrain(mode=1). But I do not know RemoveGrainS.

Boulder 01-05-2005 04:57 AM

RemoveGrainS is the version which includes one dll that is required to use the filter. The function is exactly the same as DRemoveGrain/RemoveGrain. DRemoveGrain uses SSE2 instructions and RemoveGrain iSSE which means it's usable with Athlon XP.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:40 PM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd

Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.