digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]

digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/)
-   Avisynth Scripting (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/avisynth/)
-   -   MVBR one-pass calculation. "A New Approach" (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/avisynth/2900-mvbr-pass-calculation.html)

kwag 06-02-2003 04:54 PM

MovieStacker and ToK :wink:
That's basically it. With MovieStacker, you create your basic .avs scripts, and then let ToK automatically calculate your CQ and encode your movie :!:

-kwag

ezysk 06-02-2003 08:31 PM

I'm assuming this is done when Tok runs several test clips with different CQ values in TEMPGenc. The "Initial CQ Value" can anything be put into that field? Is that relevant since TEMPGenc does the final CQ encode ouput?

kwag 06-02-2003 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ezysk
I'm assuming this is done when Tok runs several test clips with different CQ values in TEMPGenc. The "Initial CQ Value" can anything be put into that field? Is that relevant since TEMPGenc does the final CQ encode ouput?

Yes. I use a CQ of 75 to start off. Then ToK will find the optimal CQ and encode the movie.

-kwag

vico1 06-13-2003 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kwag
I use a CQ of 75 to start off. Then ToK will find the optimal CQ and encode the movie.

-kwag

I take it, that because the TOK sampler uses it`s set formula to run...that it
probably wouldn`t matter if you started with say...a CQ of 60 to start instead
of 75, if you were pretty sure it was closer to that value... :?:
(maybe cutting down on samples???)


************************************
The Devil.....is always.....in the Details!

kwag 06-13-2003 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vico1
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwag
I use a CQ of 75 to start off. Then ToK will find the optimal CQ and encode the movie.

-kwag

I take it, that because the TOK sampler uses it`s set formula to run...that it
probably wouldn`t matter if you started with say...a CQ of 60 to start instead
of 75, if you were pretty sure it was closer to that value... :?:
(maybe cutting down on samples???)


************************************
The Devil.....is always.....in the Details!

Unless 60 was very close to the actual CQ needed for your particular movie. Then it would be a faster prediction :)

-kwag


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15 AM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd

Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.