I'm currently trying out the asharp's adaptive sharpening. If it works as advertized ( 8) ), then I'll turn it on. From the readme file of asharp, here's what it does:
- adaptive thresholding to avoid noise enhancement - block adaptive sharpenning to avoid DCT block edges enhancement - block based adaptive thresholding to avoid DCT block edges enhancement So this combination, together with the adaptive filtering (bluring) on action and scene changes, should be a killer :D -kwag |
Note: The first line of "asharp" in the script should read: asharp(2,0) and not asharp(1,0).
I fixed that. :imstupid: |
@Kwag
you wrote: "@all, Thanks for your patience" are you kidding? we all are thankfull for your great work. :D without your friendship and developing, this forum couldn't never be so great. thanks for the script update too. :wink: @audioslave i ever use bicubic precise in all my tests and in the last encodes. :) @all great work! i'm thankfull :D the Kwag team is the best. :!: |
MY Test
I just did a couple of tests using asharp.
Test Basics: (Current Script) kvcdX3 - MPEG1 CQ=80 Sample Length=1656 Frames (69 seconds) MinBitrate=300, Max Bitrate=2500, VBV=40, GOP 1-5823-2-1-24 Filesize with asharp(2,0) = 8,653,029 Filesize with asharp(2,2) = 7,236,833 (16.37% smaller) kvcdX3 - MPEG2 CQ=80 Sample Length=1656 Frames (69 seconds) MinBitrate=600, Max Bitrate=6000, VBV=224, GOP 1-5823-2-1-18 Filesize with asharp(2,0) = 19,076,155 Filesize with asharp(2,2) = 15,308,597 (19.75% smaller) I don't see much difference in quality (but I don't have the best eyes. :) ) I think that adaptive shapening is the way to go with asharp. Racer99 |
Here's a small ( ~1MB ) sample with the new script :D
www.kvcd.net/red-planet-short-asharp-704x480.mpg -kwag |
Re: MY Test
Quote:
-kwag |
:imstupid: :imstupid::imstupid::imstupid:
Latest correction: I was passing bluring variables as INT instead of FLOAT :imstupid: The scaling on blurring was incorrect, as it was in harder steps ( -1, -2, -3, etc. ). Fixed. It's now floating point values ( -1.12, -2.142, etc. ) -kwag |
hey Kwag,
i don't test the "very new" yet, i see it only now. the last script before your corrections give some staircases like in lanczos, did you see some like this? i see it in detail in 352x240. with more "resize" this thin lines with staircases are hard to see. can i encode a movie using 720x480 in one cdr80 or cdr90 with audio in 160k and got good result :?: i'm asking cos never did with more than 480x480. i did only samples in pc and the results are incredibles. i never see this resolution in the tv. ps: i got a new player phillips and he play all kvcds. 8) i did a big search to find what was the best. 2 weeks testing with tons of kvcds in the shops, 8O i post it in the portuguese forum. the important now isn't the dvd player. the best is the kvcd player :!: :wink: @racer, i'm with you! asharp(2,2) ... (2,4) give more sharp and less size! i think that (2,2) is a "gently" sharpness. :wink: |
Quote:
The "Red Planet" samples I posted were all 704x480 with a CQ for one 80 minute CD :!: Audio at 112Kbps. -kwag |
Quote:
what CQ did you find in the sample :?: |
Quote:
-kwag |
God I was testing the whole night, and now everything has changed again... :cry: 8)
well as for noise reduction and sharpness, I found that this line would best replace Unfilter(50,50) : Code:
Unfilter(10,10) |
Quote:
Did you see the latest one: asharp(2, 4, 0.25, hqbf=true) Have you tested that one :?: It seems that asharp is way faster than unfilter :!: -kwag |
currently testing... :wink:
|
Quote:
-kwag |
@kwag
So what are you waiting for?! Show us a clip, man! :D EDIT: Would be nice with info on CQ etc. |
Quote:
-kwag |
:lol: :lol: :lol:
|
Ok, this one should top just about every other sample ever made at KVCD.Net :mrgreen:
www.kvcd.net/red-planet-extreme-704x480.mpg Specs: 31 second sample, 3,838KB. Res. 704x480, CQ=63.42, MIN bitrate 300Kbps, MAX bitrate 2,500Kbps KVCD "Notch" Q. Matrix. GOP 1-12-2-1-24, Current script as posted Ver. June 5, 2003 @05:45GMT :mrgreen: -kwag |
@kwag
I didn't have any luck with squeezing "A Knight's Tale" onto one CDR :cry: . When I made the prediction I got a CQ value 25-30(!) for one CDR, and I guess that won't be very exciting to look at... If a movie contains a lot of fast action scenes will it be easier to fit on a single disc? |
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.