digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]

digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/)
-   Avisynth Scripting (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/avisynth/)
-   -   Avisynth: add LoadPluginEx.dll line to DVD2SVCD.ini file (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/avisynth/3782-avisynth-add-loadpluginexdll.html)

telemike 05-28-2003 04:56 AM

Avisynth: add LoadPluginEx.dll line to DVD2SVCD.ini file
 
over at forum.doom9.org

Quote:

I recently updated my version of DVD2SVCD to the latest version of DVD2SVCD 1.1.3 build 2. I also opted to try out the 2.51 version of AVS only to find out that all of my favorite filters do not work with this new version of AVS. I was able to find new versions of most of them, here http://www.avisynth.org/~warpenterprises/. But by reading and searching the AVS forum I found, that by downloading the warpsharp package , I could use all of them!! The package contains a "LoadPluginEx.dll" that will allow you to use most 2.0 filters. Simply add a "LoadPluginEx.dll" line to your "DVD2SVCD.ini" file
:wink:

jorel 05-28-2003 05:30 AM

great telemike.

thanks.
:wink:

more informations:
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.ph...t=loadpluginex
:!:

telemike 05-28-2003 05:52 AM

Hopefully, it will help Kwag and us do better stuff!

PyRoMaNiA 05-28-2003 06:08 AM

Does this mean we can start using AviSynth 2.51 now? :)

Is it faster than 2.08? :?

Dialhot 05-28-2003 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PyRoMaNiA
Does this mean we can start using AviSynth 2.51 now? :)

Is it faster than 2.08? :?

35% percent faster if you use the new default color space (YV12).

But some filters like temporalsmoother used in the "optimal script" work only in YUY2. Then the gain isn't so important.

For my part, I decided to use other filters :-))

jorel 05-28-2003 08:05 AM

friends, please read this :

deserve more tests ,see what i got:

with avisynth 208:
Encoding... CQ : 60,000
Final Encoded Size: 7.990.528<---------less size
Total Time (all operations): 00:04:28<-----more time

with avisynth 251:
Encoding... CQ : 60,000
Final Encoded Size: 8.027.452<--------more size
Total Time (all operations): 00:04:24<-----less time

:? :? :?
i'm doing more tests :!:
someone did tests :?:

more....

AvisynthSwitcher 0.2
http://www.kvcd.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=20939#20939

read about
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.ph...isynthswitcher
:wink:

edited...i wrote wrong version of avisynth. :oops:

jorel 05-28-2003 09:10 AM

results from new test:

using the same source only changing the avisynth version :!:
of course, using converttoyuy2() with avisynth251,
this is the only difference in the scripts used for tests.

with avisynth208:
script1-
Encoding... CQ : 60,000
Final Encoded Size: 8.133.225<-----less
Total Time (all operations): 00:03:32<-----more

script2-
Encoding... CQ : 60,000
Final Encoded Size: 8.589.198<-----less
Total Time (all operations): 00:04:05<-----more

with avisynth251:
script1-
Encoding... CQ : 60,000
Final Encoded Size: 8.169.729<-----more
Total Time (all operations): 00:03:26<-----less

script2-
Encoding... CQ : 60,000
Final Encoded Size: 8.760.655<-----more
Total Time (all operations): 00:03:31<-----less

:? :?

did anyone test it?
i got less time with version251 but more size and
got more time with version258 but less size.
:? :?

edited...i wrote(again)the wrong version of avisynth.
:oops: :oops:

Dialhot 05-28-2003 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jorel
results from new test:

using the same source only changing the avisynth version :!:
of course, using converttoyuy2() with avisynth251,
this is the only difference in the scripts used for tests.

Why "of course" ? For sure you don't have a big gain in time if you convert to YUY2. This is the operation that take you the biggest part of your encoding time :-)

Try to remove this line (and if some filters complain because they need to have YUY2, comment them out, we just doing test there no ? :-)).

You will have a _big_ difference !

Quote:

with avisynth258
you surely mean 208, don't you ?

jorel 05-28-2003 09:40 AM

[quote="Dialhot"]
Quote:

Originally Posted by jorel
results from new test:

using the same source only changing the avisynth version :!:
of course, using converttoyuy2() with avisynth251,
this is the only difference in the scripts used for tests.

Why "of course" ? For sure you don't have a big gain in time if you convert to YUY2. This is the operation that take you most of the part of your encoding time :-)

Try to remove this line (and if some filters complain because they need to have YUY2, comment them out, we just doing test there no ? :-)).

You will have a _big_ difference !

Quote:

with avisynth258[\quote]

you surely mean 208, don't you ?
Dialhot :)

but if i don't use converttoyuy2() some filters don't work in 251 version!
legalclip is an example...
or i'm loosing some informations?!?!?!
:?

Dialhot 05-28-2003 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jorel
but if i don't use converttoyuy2() some filters don't work in 251 version!

The only one that I know (and then don't use) is temporalsmoother !

That's the only one that is not converted to YUY2. But for all the other filters you have to use the 251 version of the filter ! Not the 208 and the (not so) famous "loadpluginex.dll".

QUITE ALL FILTERS HAVE A 251 VERSION. Go to http://www.avisynth.org/~warpenterprises and you'll see.

Quote:

legalclip is an example...
LegalClip has a builtin equivalent within AVS251 called Limiter.

Quote:

or i'm loosing some informations?!?!?!
:?
If think so, but this forum is there to give you all informations, no ? :-D

jorel 05-28-2003 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dialhot
Quote:

Originally Posted by jorel
but if i don't use converttoyuy2() some filters don't work in 251 version!

The only one that I know (and then don't use) is temporalsmoother !

That's the only one that is not converted to YUY2. But for all the other filters you have to use the 251 version of the filter ! Not the 208 and the (not so) famous "loadpluginex.dll".

QUITE ALL FILTERS HAVE A 251 VERSION. Go to http://www.avisynth.org/~warpenterprises and you'll see.

Quote:

legalclip is an example...
LegalClip has a builtin equivalent within AVS251 called Limiter.

Quote:

or i'm loosing some informations?!?!?!
:?
If think so, but this forum is there to give you all informations, no ? :-D

ok friend,
i want to read more.
:wink:

but unfilter,legalclip,msharp,firlddeinterlace...
don't work without converttoyuy2() in my 98se.
and i got big sizes in my tests,did you see?
:?
can you help more?

jorel 05-28-2003 10:21 AM

please,help me to remove my doubt:

test this script using avisynth 251... :arrow: without converttoyuy2()
and post the result please cos in my system don't work:

FieldDeinterlace()
unfilter(50,50)
BicubicResize(448,448,0,0.6,0,0,720,480)
AddBorders(16,16,16,16)

:wink:

Dialhot 05-28-2003 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jorel
but unfilter,legalclip,msharp,firlddeinterlace...
don't work without converttoyuy2() in my 98se.

Did you used the AVS251 version ?

I use unfilter in YV12, fieddeinterlace also. Legalclip have to be replaced by Limiter has I told you above. And I don't use msharp.

Quote:

and i got big sizes in my tests,did you see?
:?
can you help more?
I never made any test on the size, just on the encoding time. BTW, the size difference you had isn't so big, no ?

Dialhot 05-28-2003 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jorel
please,help me to remove my doubt:

test this script using avisynth 251... :arrow: without converttoyuy2()
and post the result please cos in my system don't work:

FieldDeinterlace()
unfilter(50,50)
BicubicResize(448,448,0,0.6,0,0,720,480)
AddBorders(16,16,16,16)

:wink:

Sorry, I can't do this in my office and I'll be far from my own PC for one week (vacation). But I'm sure someone will be glad to test it for us :-)

Else I'll do it when I come back.

jorel 05-28-2003 10:59 AM

from ToK log results with unfilter i got:
avisynth251 :arrow: 8.169.729
avisynth208 :arrow: 8.133.225
8.169.729 - 8.133.225 = 36.504...more
for 00:01:07 used in sample.

not too big for 00:01:07 but
will be huge for full movie :!:


thanks friend,i understand your reason...(vaction).

:wink:

edited...
:oops: :oops: :oops:
3 times with stup....wrote wrong version of avisynth.
now is ok...the version is 208 :!:

bman 05-28-2003 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jorel
from ToK log results with unfilter i got:
avisynth251 :arrow: 8.169.729
avisynth258 :arrow: 8.133.225
8.169.729 - 8.133.225 = 36.504...more
for 00:01:07 used in sample.

not too big for 00:01:07 but
will be huge for full movie :!:


thanks friend,i understand your reason...(vaction).

:wink:

Hi Jorel !
Were did u get avisynth 2.58 8O 8O 8O
bman

jorel 05-28-2003 01:57 PM

:imstupid:

sorry friend, i'm using 208. :oops:

thanks.
:wink:

anyone did tests like me?
:?

ps:
download the last warpsharp:
http://www.geocities.co.jp/SiliconValley-PaloAlto/2382/
:wink:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52 AM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd

Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.