Quote:
-kwag |
It seems not to work with PAL system. :cry:
I try prediction with "The Matrix" for one CD at 704x576 (I have recently encoded it at that resolution with CQ 56): - average bitrate 755 (cutting end credits) - set min=430 / max 2000 (using ToK 0.0.5.2, Avisynth 2.5x and last script) - factor for prediction 1,02 (overburning) - new faster prediction (Tenra) with precision 0,5% - lenght of sample 24 / nr. of sample 1 - audio 128 and GOP 25 Ended prediction with factor of apprx. 34... :oops: Any idea? 8O I rest with my method, working for me (PAL): standard setting in ToK (v0.0.5.2), but with nr. of sample set to "2", GOP 25 and lenght of sample 24 (works also well with fast prediction). :wink: |
Quote:
-kwag |
kwag wrote:
Quote:
frames 186314 time 02:04:13 PAL 25 frames 186314/124/25 = 60,10 800 MB - 115 MB (audio) = 685 MB (for video) 685/60,10 = 11,39 MB (size for sample) found CQ 57,3 (at 11,4 MB) :P Well, but now the most important thing: encoding! :D Thanks kwag, as soon as possible I post my result... :!: EDIT: Well, encoding finished, final file size is 686 MB! 8O -break |
sampler prediction "script" samples..
Hello peoples :)
Does anyone have any good .AVS samples of the "sampler" for the manual prediction method ?? All I have (after a careful search) is what I got (below) but I know there are some missing pieces before and after hte Sampler() ... Note, I'm not using MStacker (nor do I have it installed) I'm simply trying to understand the "prediction" process :) Code:
Sampler(length=24) -vhelp |
Re: sampler prediction "script" samples..
Quote:
Then I launch TMPGEnc to create sample video, after I found exact size I want, comment last line (sampler command) with "#", and encode the full movie. I remember you the great Kwag guide for understand manual prediction here: http://www.kvcd.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2102 I hope this can help you. :wink: -break |
hi break..
Thanks for your response. Actaully, I have read that link - many times, and am still a bit dazed at it. But, in any case, I don't think it is used any longer, per Kwag's recommend (elsewheres) where he (in so many words) said, this is the new prefered method or something like that. I can't remember. But, I read that that link has some issues w/ which page has the actual how-to preduct process. Sooner or later, I'm bound to get it. At the moment, I'm resarching one too many things :) Thanks again pal, -vhelp |
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.