Avisynth: CQ Matic static script?
I saw you posted a static script in the CQ Matic section of the forum. To not be totally off topic I decided to post my questions here instead.
The script you posted was this: Quote:
Can't wait for your reply! :) P.S. I will be away for a couple of hours (cover band gig) but I will rejoin the forum after we're done. :wink: |
Sorry for the delay :-)
I also had good impact on the CQ for a couple of encoding a did with this script. The only fear I have is that usually a gain in CQ is the result of a loss in details. It seems in this case that it is not the case. So the script seems quite good. Now, if you had too much filter after that perhaps it will be "too much". I'm pretty sure you can had a blur on the chroma, but a blur on the luma... I don't know. That have to be tested :-) Note: you can also use BicubicResize insteed of LanczosResize. You will gain 1 or 2 point on your CQ. |
I'm back...
Okay, guess I will be up all night testing then :) Yes, I really think your static script preserves the details very well! Surprisingly well, in fact. I will try encoding with both MergeChroma and MergeLuma just to see how it turns out. While I'm at it, do you use 2000 for max. bitrate and 300 for min. bitrate with the script (480x576 resolution). And do you use CalcuMatic to get the average bitrate for CQMatic? Sorry to bother you with all these questions, but I got VERY excited when I tried the script. |
Hi audioslave,
I wouldn't use anything less that 2,500Kbps, if I'm not using the MA script. With a static script, you won't gain compresion on high speed scenes, and you will have some visible macro blocks if you use a MAX of 2,000Kbps. If you use the MA scrip, or a combination of dialhot's script with some MA lines included, then you can lower your MAX to 2,000Kbps. -kwag |
Good evening kwag! Glad to see someone else but me is awake at this late hour (03:02 in Sweden). Okay, then I have to change the bitrate coz I did a test encode with 2000 MAX and I did get some blocks. Not much, but they were clearly there.
|
Try something like this:
Code:
BlindPP(cpu=4) -kwag |
Great! Thanks a lot. Will try it right away. :wink:
|
Quote:
1 PAL 25fps 544*576 1h28 min=64 max=2300 CQ=79 (:!:) 1 NTSC 23.976fps 480*480 1h38 min=64 max=2200 CQ=71 (I used 3:2 pulldown while playback for this one) For both of them I used calcumatic for finding the average setting for an audio bitrate of 128 kb/s and a target size of 807 MB. CQmatic found the correct CQ and gave me two movie of 796 and 802 MB in near 5 hours for each movie (on a P4 1.3Ghz). Smart, quick and perfect :-) |
Hmmm, "Parse error: string missing closing quotation mark (line 11, column 46)"...???
Quote:
|
Quote:
Something like : Code:
STMedianFilter( 3, fmin(32,round(3/nf)), 1, 1 ) |
:oops: Sorry :!:
Wrong Cut&Paste :x Try this: Code:
## Test script ## |
Quote:
-kwag |
Quote:
Quote:
|
So, kwag, the script should look something like this?
Quote:
|
Yes. that should do it.
It's too much filtering for me :mrgreen: But if you really want to cram the most "Bang for the buck" ( :lol: ), that should squeeze the crap out of your movie :D -kwag |
Quote:
1/ C3D and STMedianfitler are quite the same filters. Really don't need both. 2/ try temporalcleaner insteed of temporalsoften. I find it faster and smarter. (use TemporalCleaner(round(5+nf), round(11+nf)) 3/ Normally the last converttoRGB24 is useless. Try without it and let see if TMPGEnc does not complain. All is matter of codecs installed on your PC. I never use it ! 4/ Your borders aren't block aligned : you aren't in the best configuration and your CQ suffer from this. EDIT: 5/ use Bicubic precise if you want to raise a little your CQ |
:D It might be too much for me too. But what the hell, that's a price you'll have to pay for squeezing The Matrix Reloaded (PAL) onto 1 CD-R! :wink:
|
You should also try a CD90min : 100 MB more for your movie :-)
|
Yes, that would be fantastic. But my burner doesn't support 90-99min CD-R's :cry:
|
Dialhot wrote
Quote:
What do you mean with "Your borders aren't block aligned : you aren't in the best configuration and your CQ suffer from this." How do I correct this? |
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.