CCE 2,3,4,5 Pass Compared to CQ
Alright, I've done some tests, and I cannot find any visual differences between the 2, 3, 4, and 5 pass tests, compared to a 20 CQ value on CCE.
Anyone out there know what the differences are for the 5 passes (or more)? |
Personally, I think that anything over four passes (with CCE), is visually indistinguisheable from 20, 30, 100 passes :!:
The difference (if any!) will only be seen by zooming in on detailed materials, which are absolutely invisible on a TV set (even HDTV). For practical purposes, I wouldn't go over three passes. -kwag |
And to answer to your question : there is no (distinguishable) diff between 3 passes and Q=20. That is why we prefer to use OPV mode : we reach the same result in the third of the time ! (plus a little amount of time for prediction).
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
To help me in finding whqt is the correct filesize I simply use KDVDCalc that Vmesquita did some months ago. |
The curve is not linear..I'm sure tylo would have discovered that when he designed the D2SRoBa plugin.
EDIT: See here : http://www.saunalahti.fi/sainki/RoBaQFinder12.zip |
Quote:
On the range 0 to 100, the curve is probably not so linear. |
Quote:
CCEFRONT http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.ph...light=ccefront |
Quote:
|
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.