digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]

digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/)
-   Video Encoding and Conversion (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/encode/)
-   -   how to convert Kvcd to skvcd? (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/encode/173-how-convert-kvcd.html)

geeza 05-24-2002 08:00 PM

how to convert Kvcd to skvcd?
 
hiya kwag,
how do i get your template to svcd quality? and would the svcd 90 minute movie go on one disc? #2, on the kvcd side of things, how do i get rid of blockiness and sharpen up the images? i'm a bit of a newbie, so be gentle with me. 8)

kwag 05-24-2002 09:04 PM

Re: kvcd to skvcd?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by geeza
hiya kwag,
how do i get your template to svcd quality? and would the svcd 90 minute movie go on one disc? #2, on the kvcd side of things, how do i get rid of blockiness and sharpen up the images? i'm a bit of a newbie, so be gentle with me. 8)

To svcd? Increase the bit rate to 2,500Kbps+ :wink:
90 minute SVCD? Try it, let me know how it looks!

The sharper the image, the more blocks you will see. This is inherently true for any mpeg encode. Mpeg works better with softer images. Sharp edges produce visible blocks. Unless your bit rate is extremely high, or the material you're encoding is extremely clean.

You'll never get that from a DVD Rip, Video captures, or DIVx conversions.

Only from an MGM uncompresses video ( which we'll never get 8) )

kwag

slab 05-24-2002 09:21 PM

KSVCD
 
I've been using "KWAG'S" help/knowledge for awhile and have been very impressed with the templates and the work ethnic that He has put in here to help us all...It has been a tireless effort from His constant patience and also wonderful demeanor to boot!...Thx again!..Well, to get to your question, I have been using the templates to make amazing quality (X)KSVCD's for awhile now..My player does not like VCD's at 352x480 and I do not like the lower resolution of 352x240 (eventhough it works) so I have been making MPEG-2 using the templates and some fine adjustments..(Pls be aware, this is what works for my player and system only), but the results have been truely outstanding. I use the standard Smartripper,DVD2AVI,(FFilm) and encode using TMPGEnc (new version2.54a)..the only adjustments I make to the current template is I encode in MPEG-2 with the folllowing slight changes...By changing to MPEG-2 it unlocks the template and opens up the full template..On the lower half of the "Video Tab" I change the "Encode mode"(normally greyed out) to "3:2 pulldown when playback"..now this changes the "FrameRate" to "23.976 fps (internally to 29.97fps)"..this seems to always correct any and all jerkyness or audio synth problems everytime...After alot of testing, I found out I can use a CQ of 75 and get very,very acceptable quality with the current "GOP structure" (1,18,3,1) and fit almost any movie on one cd...amazing..Try it out (you will be surprized at the file sizes, compared to MPEG-1) and I hope you will be as pleased as I am.... 8)

slab 05-24-2002 09:27 PM

By the way..I forgot to add that I also encode at min=0 max=1450... cuz my player can handle it and I still use JStereo since my surround system seems to handle this just fine (also adds to smaller files)...Have fun~! 8)

kwag 05-24-2002 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slab
By the way..I forgot to add that I also encode at min=0 max=1450... cuz my player can handle it and I still use JStereo since my surround system seems to handle this just fine (also adds to smaller files)...Have fun~! 8)

Hi slab:

Have you tried CCE to compare the quality against TMPEG 2.54a?

I have a lot of critics about CCE being better than TMPEG at MPEG-2.
I know, for a fact and personal trials, that TMPEG just sweeps CCE at MPEG-1, at any bit rate.
But I haven't done any full MPEG-2 encodes with CCE to compare against TMPEG.
Only small clips. And so far, I'll stick with TMPEG. Not only for all the added value tools it has, but I think that if CCE produces a better MPEG-2, it's not worth $2,000 against $48.00 for TMPEG plus. :roll:

kwag

slab 05-25-2002 12:16 AM

No I have'nt tried CCE ....and the results I can get from your template and TMPGenc are not worth my time to teach this "ole dog a new trick" :roll: ..You are the man KWAG!..I am very happy with the results you have provided all of us..Pls try for yourself.. your very own template with MPEG-2 works awesome!

Video tab = MPEG-2...352x480
FrameRate=23.976fps(internally29.97)
Encodemode=3:2 pulldown when playback
CQ 75 min=0/max=1450
GOP = 1,18,3,1
Audio = 44100/128 Joint Stereo/Dual ( choose personal preference)
System = MPEG-2 Super VideoCD(VBR)

kwag 05-25-2002 12:31 AM

And if I recall, I think CCE can't handle large GOP's anyway, so I guess that CCE is not an option for larger compression. :lol:

I just did a test with TMPEG and the template, just switched to MPEG-2, and made a small test clip.
The file size came out about the same as the MPEG-1, but I do notice a very small amount of unstable video in still and low motion scenes.
This is viewing with PowerDVD. Have you tried an exact number of frames ( say 720 frames, 30 seconds, from x to y position of a film ) and compared side by side the results of the MPEG-1 and MPEG-2?.

I do see a difference, not much, but it's visible.

kwag

slab 05-25-2002 12:43 AM

Yes, I have tried exact frame counts..I actually get a better compression with (x)KSVCD...I lowered the CQ to 75 because I was getting some blocking on my machine at the higher CQ of 80. To each his own I guess 8O . Maybe try a small test on your player, for a quick looksee 8)...The only jerkyness I noticed was if I did not change the "Encode mode" on the video tab to "3:2 pulldown when playback" vs Non-Interlaced for forced film encode.

kwag 05-25-2002 02:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slab
Yes, I have tried exact frame counts..I actually get a better compression with (x)KSVCD...I lowered the CQ to 75 because I was getting some blocking on my machine at the higher CQ of 80. To each his own I guess 8O . Maybe try a small test on your player, for a quick looksee 8)...The only jerkyness I noticed was if I did not change the "Encode mode" on the video tab to "3:2 pulldown when playback" vs Non-Interlaced for forced film encode.

But how could you get blocking by lowering the CQ to 75 8O
The lower the CQ, the lower the bit rate, and the more visible blocks. Could you try that again please :?

kwag

geeza 05-25-2002 02:26 AM

kwag,
video bitrate is greyed out, how do i change it? :(

geeza 05-25-2002 02:57 AM

hello there slab,
you, like alot of others on this forum, seem to have the kvcd to skvcd figured out. i'm in the uk and have only recently started to encode :cry: . any chance you could post some more settings/results, or mail me? :) i suppose this goes out to all of you here?! :lol:

slab 05-27-2002 02:46 AM

Quote:

But how could you get blocking by lowering the CQ to 75 8O
The lower the CQ, the lower the bit rate, and the more visible blocks. Could you try that again please :?

kwag
Sure, I would be glad to try that again...My tests as stated before are
Quote:

"..(what works for my player and system only),
Here's how I got to my preferred quality on my peticular set-up...Since your original GOP/CQ started at 70 and your new GOP/CQ was adjusted to 80 (figuring the appropriate changes in GOP(templates), respectively) I halved the CQ as a start to 75 "to see"...Using the first few minutes of "As Good As It Gets"... I encoded 2 minute blocks (with your new GOP, 1-18-3-1) at CQ 75, CQ 80, CQ-76..and CQ 74)...I scan darker areas of clips on playback for evenness and what I call "blocking"...The problem right off the bat, might be my interpretation of what "blocking' is...I consider a grouping of off color smudges (squares) that randomly move in shaded areas as a group of "blocks"..this may be totally incorrect nomenclature as to what this actual effect happening is called..this is just what I call blocking...Anyway, with the added eye of my daughter we determined on "My Equipment" (27" TV). CQ-80 had the defined effect as stated above with a seemingly lighter layer of contrast/picture quality than lower CQ's!..CQ-76 was clean(no blocking :wink:) CQ-74 was of less quality...but I found CQ-75 to be
Quote:

very,very acceptable quality
in file size and quality for my viewing needs....I'm sure "results will very" with everybody..I just found like I stated in my earlier posts, that my puter and system seems to like your current GOP compression ratio with a slightly lower CQ, but I definitely agree CQ-80 is of higher quality on most systems...Just not mine (heheh) "Go Figure!"..I love this stuff!..makes my head explode!!!! :mrgreen:

By the way, I just finished "VanillaSky" (credits edited) at over 129 minutes and it came out at 734mb...MPEG-2, 352x480, centered 352x352, CQ-75, min=0/max=1450, JS, GOP 1,18,3,1...cool!!! 8)

Tutankhamun 05-27-2002 10:18 PM

Tryin SVCD!
 
Sounds a little like someone incorporated Kwags settings into a svcd template like I stated in a previous forum! I thought I was the only one toyin with that!! Glad it worked for you like it works for me.

Spyglass 06-19-2002 05:42 PM

@Slab,

When you used DVD2AVI with FFilm, and then went to SVCD 23.976 (internally 29fps) did your audio go out of sync? I'm running into that with Kate+Leopold.

Spyglass.

slab 06-20-2002 03:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spyglass
@Slab,

When you used DVD2AVI with FFilm, and then went to SVCD 23.976 (internally 29fps) did your audio go out of sync? I'm running into that with Kate+Leopold.

Spyglass.

So far so good...My encodes have been very stable.(I recently have bumped up to 480x480 resolution)

I have yet to run into any problems with using FFilm .dv2's...Everything I have done has been FFilm, but I have heard there are some pesky movies around....Hope you get it figured out.

Just a note...I do not manipulate the framerate, it auto's to 23.976fps(internally 29.97fps)by changing the encode mode on the "Video" tab to 3:2 pulldown when playback.... 8)

Spyglass 06-20-2002 07:22 AM

Hey Slab,

When you went to 480x480 what did you center it on? Before you had 352x480 and it was centered on 352x352.

I ended up trying a whole bunch of different settings, turns out for some odd reason my player just doesn't like the kvcd templates. If I load up from SVCDFilm and then modify the settings to match the SVCD templates the movie plays but with skipping motion. But if I load up the KVCD (352x480) template the player goes berserk and I get blue lines and loud beeps.

I ended up trying 480x480 for a number of different things like audio settings, 23.9 internally 29.9 with 3:2 pull down, then 23.9, CQ, CBR etc. The best I can get the player to do is play MPeg2 CQ 300min with jerky motion, I tried VBV 0, 40 48, 112. No luck with any of them. The movie plays fine with SVCDFilm template, when I switch to CQ it goes bad.

I can do MPeg1 (KVCD 352x240 1cd), but I am really disappointed with the quality. I can see blocks everywhere. I've got a 27" TV. Added to all that headache, Kate and Leopold has some audio probs as well. The audio is synched right until 1h:13mins into the movie, then it goes out of synch. I did a short clip at the 1h:20min point and that too is out of synch. Something is happening with DVD2AVI and I don't know what. I reran DVD2AVI on the 4th VOB file only which corresponded to the 1h point of the movie, and reencoded in TMPGEnc and this time the audio was in sync. Finally when I did the whole 6 VOB project again, the audio at the 1:13 mark goes out of synch. Anyone know what the hell is going on?

Spyglass.

hc1001 06-22-2002 06:47 AM

hey i finally understand what slab is getting when he is upping the CQ to 75.... i use the 704X480 kvcd 2 CD template with 29.9 fps and i noticed one time i needed to split a movie into 2 parts so i said y just use 400mb's of a cd when i have 800 to work with! so i encoded it in 75 CQ and i noticed the results were less than the CQ @ 70. i got these weird looking colors popping up fro the background and faces of the actors. it was like different color shading gave me blocking.... i burned the first CD in 70 CQ and the second one in 75. the first CD was much better because it didnt have the blocking i saw with the second cd. weird stuff......

Timberwolf 06-22-2002 10:35 AM

Yeah, I never use the 704x480-2CD template with the 80 CQ setting. From my initial tests, I see a lot of green blocks with 80 CQ. I did several tests in steps of two going down and I saw that the blocks decrease as I went down, I found the least number of blocks was at 52- 54 CQ. Then blocks again increase as you go down 50 CQ. I tried these with the movies THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH and THE ABYSS and got the same results.

Now, I just use a CQ of 52 or 54 depending what the movie allows me to. In this way I am also free to up the minimum and maximum bitrate as well as use 224kbps for the audio.

I still haven't done a movie completely devoid of any hint of blocks so can someone tell me the secret to their encoding? The quality is just so sharp but there are some secenes that I just see some blocks and never was able to get rid of. What am I doing wrong? Oh yeah, is it because I never use FitCD or Avisynth? I tried using them several times but I was just overwhelmed with the gazillions of boxes to fill out and I was never sure if I was filling them out right, so I never tried using it again

Daagar 06-25-2002 04:40 PM

Both FitCD and AVISynth can be worth learning. With FitCD, you only care about the bottom half of the screen! Kwag has done all of the work for us that you would use the top half for...

Click on the 'source' button and load your .avi file. It should correctly detect the framesize, fps, PAL, anamorphic, AR, etc. Then in the 'Destination' combo box at the bottom use the drop-down to select '1/2 DVD' (for 352x480) or 'XVCD' (for 704x480). FitCD will automatically show you the correct cropping and resizing. So this is just two things to edit ;)

As a bonus, FitCD provides and AVISynth script with the values it calculated already put in. Typically, you uncomment the TemporalSmooth(2,2) line (some people use (1,2) or (2,1), dunno the difference!), save the script, and then load _that_ file into TMPGEnc. The encode away.

kwag 07-20-2002 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spyglass
Added to all that headache, Kate and Leopold has some audio probs as well. The audio is synched right until 1h:13mins into the movie, then it goes out of synch. I did a short clip at the 1h:20min point and that too is out of synch. Something is happening with DVD2AVI and I don't know what. I reran DVD2AVI on the 4th VOB file only which corresponded to the 1h point of the movie, and reencoded in TMPGEnc and this time the audio was in sync. Finally when I did the whole 6 VOB project again, the audio at the 1:13 mark goes out of synch. Anyone know what the hell is going on?

Spyglass.

Hi Spyglass:

I had EXACTLY the same problem with Kate & Leo.
I haven't sat down to figure it out yet. Maybe it's a mastering defect that's throwing off DVD2AVI. I'm going to try DVD2AVI 1.77.3 and process the .d2v directly. The one I did was with 1.76.

-kwag

andybno1 07-21-2002 05:22 PM

I have just been reading this thread and I was wondering kwag, how about having a section where people could submit there templates and have a sample of what the quality was like??

kwag 07-21-2002 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andybno1
I have just been reading this thread and I was wondering kwag, how about having a section where people could submit there templates and have a sample of what the quality was like??

Sure!. Anyone can e-mail me the templates, and I'll post them on a separate section, just like the user contributed introduction logos.

-kwag

Jellygoose 07-23-2002 01:18 PM

hi kwag!

we've heard so many different tweaks on your templates to convert them to a skvcd... that kinda confuses one.

why not making an ORIGINAL skvcd tmeplate in the download section, as you already made kdvd templates... ?

kwag 07-23-2002 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jellygoose
hi kwag!

we've heard so many different tweaks on your templates to convert them to a skvcd... that kinda confuses one.

why not making an ORIGINAL skvcd tmeplate in the download section, as you already made kdvd templates... ?

Good question!. The answer is that if you want to use a template for SVCD, you're better off using the KDVD half D-1 template, instead of SVCD! The reason is that 352x480 MPEG-2 is a DVD compliant resolution, but 480x480 is not. So what people are doing is using the KDVD 352x480 template and burning as SVCD. Most DVD players that support SVCD will hapilly play 352x480. Also, if you ever want to move the mpegs created with the KDVD template to a DVD-R, you don't need to re-encode. You just take your mpeg and burn it with a DVD authoring program on to a DVD-R. If you make SVCD's, with the regular 480x480, you won't be able to burn them to a DVD-R without re-encoding.

-kwag

syk2c11 07-23-2002 11:42 PM

Kwag,
I can see the Max video bitrate of current setting in KDVD (half D1) is set to 2500. What would be the maximum video bitrate if I burn it as SVCD because the current value (2500) is not acceptable to me. My article says that the maximum for SVCD is 2520, is it correct?

By the way, when I say the maximum video bitrate for SVCD, I mean the maximum value which will be accepted by most DVD player. Thanks!

kwag 07-24-2002 12:31 AM

Hi syk2c11:

Yes, the MAX bit rate for a standard SVCD is 2520 to 2525. But that doesn't mean that you can't go higher!. If your DVD player supports it, go ahead and jank it up :lol:
I did set 2,500 so that it was exactly half the bit rate that is set on the Full D-1 KDVD template, and a quality equivalent to an SVCD. Also at 2,500Kbps MAX, you can fit around 8 hours of video on a DVD. :wink:

-kwag

Jellygoose 07-24-2002 06:54 AM

kwag...

yes, but isn't the KDVD half d1 template somehow restricted and optimized for DVD Compatibility?

I mean the thing that you don't need to re-encode when you wanna burn them as fully compliant DVD-Rs is a good point, but what about using a longer GOP than the KDVD Half D1 templates for KSVCDs?

wouldn't that make sense, since there's no need to make the files DVD compliant?
would i get a higher compression than?
and is the Q.Matrix already optimized for MPEG-2 compression?

sorry for asking that many questions...

kwag 07-24-2002 11:03 AM

Hi Jellygoose:

If you want a little more compression, and you don't want to worry about DVD compatibility, go ahead and increase the MAX number of frames per GOP to 48 in the NTSC template, or 50 on the PAL template. Just like in the KVCD templates.
That will give you a little more compression. The Q. matrix works fine with TMPEG in MPEG-2. You may want to change the audio from 48Khz down to 44.1Khz, if your player doesn't support 48Khz in SVCD mode. Most DVD players playing a SVCD will play correctly audio at 48Khz.

-kwag

syk2c11 07-25-2002 03:55 AM

I encoded some clips by using KDVD (half D1) template in exactly the same way as I encode KVCD Plus (704x480) template, but I found that the clips generated by KDVD half D1 (burnt as SVCD) were darker than those of KVCD plus (704x480). Is there a way to increase the brightness in KDVD half D1 template or it is caused by the lower resolution in KDVD half D1 template. (352x480 < 704x480)

kwag 07-25-2002 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by syk2c11
I encoded some clips by using KDVD (half D1) template in exactly the same way as I encode KVCD Plus (704x480) template, but I found that the clips generated by KDVD half D1 (burnt as SVCD) were darker than those of KVCD plus (704x480). Is there a way to increase the brightness in KDVD half D1 template or it is caused by the lower resolution in KDVD half D1 template. (352x480 < 704x480)

Un-check "Output YUV data as Basic YCbCr not CCIR601" in TMPEG.

-kwag

kwag 07-26-2002 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jellygoose
hi kwag!

we've heard so many different tweaks on your templates to convert them to a skvcd... that kinda confuses one.

why not making an ORIGINAL skvcd tmeplate in the download section, as you already made kdvd templates... ?

Hi Jellygoose,

Well, after you, and many people E-mailing me about SKVCD, it's finally out :lol: ( Pressure works :P )
So don't worry about modifying the KDVD half D-1. Go to the download area and try the SKVCD 352x480. It will give you 60 minutes+ per CD with SVCD quality. I did a SVCD and a KSVCD and played them both on my JVC player, and there's no visual difference :wink:
You burn the MPEG as a SVCD with whatever. I used VCDEasy.

Enjoy!,
-kwag

a_star62 07-26-2002 11:38 PM

Kwag,
no offense, but I think that only 60 minutes on a CD with that resolution is unacceptable by the standards that you have set. Actually, I know that you can surpass those standards becuase I have done it with a modification to your KVCDx2 BETA (whih is now plus but I havent upgraded yet) by just changing to MPEG-2 and selecting 3:2 pulldown when playback. This has given me 60 minutes a disc on the Two whole movies that I have tried with it, John Q and the Mothman Prophecies. I also happened to be using 320kbps audio. IT is amazing I just wish that I could get surround sound!!!! That should be your next task! Just kidding I dont think that it is possible. The template I have created gives dvd quality video. it is amazing. try it out kwag. I dont know if you used 3532x480 for compatibility reasons and I dont know why you used a quality setting fo 27 either. I use 15 on the 704x480 but I do understand that the other templates need higher CQ_VBR levels. Give the 704x480 mpeg-2 a shot anf I think you will be amazed.

A-Star

kwag 07-27-2002 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by a_star62
Kwag,
no offense, but I think that only 60 minutes on a CD with that resolution is unacceptable by the standards that you have set. Actually, I know that you can surpass those standards becuase I have done it with a modification to your KVCDx2 BETA (whih is now plus but I havent upgraded yet) by just changing to MPEG-2 and selecting 3:2 pulldown when playback. This has given me 60 minutes a disc on the Two whole movies that I have tried with it, John Q and the Mothman Prophecies. I also happened to be using 320kbps audio. IT is amazing I just wish that I could get surround sound!!!! That should be your next task! Just kidding I dont think that it is possible. The template I have created gives dvd quality video. it is amazing. try it out kwag. I dont know if you used 3532x480 for compatibility reasons and I dont know why you used a quality setting fo 27 either. I use 15 on the 704x480 but I do understand that the other templates need higher CQ_VBR levels. Give the 704x480 mpeg-2 a shot anf I think you will be amazed.

A-Star

Hi A-Star:

The reason for the resolution of 352x480 is for compatibility with DVD/SVCD players. Almost every DVD/SVCD player will play 352x480 MPEG-2 burned as SVCD, but not many will play 704x480 MPEG-2 as SVCD mode. There is barely any difference in quality from 480x480 to 352x480, because the 480 horizontal lines is what gives the most visual sharpness. I already tried a SVCD 480x480 @2,500 CBR and it looks the same as the SKVCD with it's default settings. The quality value of 27 had to be set, because that template is also using the KVCD Q. Matrix and CQ_VBR. The quality value has to be set completely different if you use the standard TMPEG Q. Matrix and GOP. It would have to be up in the 65 value to give an equivalent quality. I'll be posting some samples tomorrow.

-kwag

muaddib 07-27-2002 01:10 AM

Hi kwag,

What is the VBV setting for?
I noticed that with the kvcd-plus it's set to 40, and with the skvcd it's set to 112... :roll:

kwag 07-27-2002 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by muaddib
Hi kwag,

What is the VBV setting for?
I noticed that with the kvcd-plus it's set to 40, and with the skvcd it's set to 112... :roll:

Yes. It's set to 112, just like a standard SVCD template.
Here's a description of what the VBV is: http://www.bretl.com/mpeghtml/VBV.HTM


-kwag

kwag 07-27-2002 11:07 AM

Last minute changes to SKVCD template.
 
@All:

After a couple of tests with different movies, I switched the encoding on the SKVCD from CQ_VBR to CQ. I got very mixed results, some looked great, some looked like crap!.
So MPEG-2 with CQ_VBR and KVCD's Q . Matrix + KVCD's GOP behaves very unpredictable. Now it's back to CQ mode with a quality value of 75, which is very close to the actual KDVD half D-1 template.
File sizes are still good for an average 60 minutes per CD.
Here are two samples so that you can compare the files.
The samples are from "Kate and Leopold" which, by the way it's a great movie, but it's a crappy quality DVD. The mastering done for that DVD was garbage. I can see artifacts on many scenes of the movie on my HDTV.
Standard 480x480 SVCD @2520CBR:
http://ns1.shidima.com/kwag/film-svcd.mpg
SKVCD 352x480:
http://ns1.shidima.com/kwag/film-skvcd.mpg

The posted template reflects the latest changes. If you downloaded the SKVCD template before this post, please re-download it.
http://www.kvcd.net/dvd-models.html

-kwag

rendalunit 07-27-2002 12:57 PM

I'd like to burn one of these ksvcds because of the two audio tracks and switchable subs but my player can't handle 480x480 svcds unless it has a vcd header. Will it maybe play the 352x480 ksvcd? Also how does the quality compare to the 704x480plus temp?

kwag 07-27-2002 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rendalunit
I'd like to burn one of these ksvcds because of the two audio tracks and switchable subs but my player can't handle 480x480 svcds unless it has a vcd header. Will it maybe play the 352x480 ksvcd? Also how does the quality compare to the 704x480plus temp?

Hi ren,

Maybe you should try and burn the SKVCD sample and see if it plays in your DVD. But like any SVCD, it's far behind from the quality produced by the 704x480 plus template :wink:

-kwag


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52 PM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd

Site design, images and content © 2002-2026 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2026 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.